Fraser Young
Member
Registered: 26th Dec 02
Location: Dundee City Drives: 58 Impreza WRX
User status: Offline
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/742e5/742e50d78b8bb2b2ff5d4a4bb0c4ae80229e9368" alt=""
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
what mods?
what was it before?
looks nice
|
Fraser Young
Member
Registered: 26th Dec 02
Location: Dundee City Drives: 58 Impreza WRX
User status: Offline
|
Mantzel powerbox and Unichip thats bout all...
Pretty pleased with though was hoping for bout 130 (only 3 shy of it tho!)
Dont know what was before
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
theres quite a power jump from 4500 to 5000 there
|
broster
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Dec 02
Location: Drives: E39
User status: Offline
|
130bhp cant be bad, i got 140 with cams head work and exhaust manifold. nice bit of torque too, shows the lexmaul gives more torque tho.
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
thats a really shit graph
this is a unichip and a dblias inlet
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81e6e/81e6ec2bfa137cf0a51435788b905d07865466d2" alt=""
|
stubbsy
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 01
Location: stoke-on-trent
User status: Offline
|
how much u spent on work done to engine fwazza??? this is the sort of power i will be happy with outa my gsi, also broster how much u spent?????
|
Darren
Member
Registered: 21st Apr 02
Location: Hadleigh, Suffolk
User status: Offline
|
my x16xe kicked out 131 with velos and uni chip data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05510/05510995a1cff15bb0100e7ba744384fad3c294a" alt=""
|
broster
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Dec 02
Location: Drives: E39
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by stubbsy
how much u spent on work done to engine fwazza??? this is the sort of power i will be happy with outa my gsi, also broster how much u spent?????
i spent a fair wack, but limiter with the lexmaul for peek power how ever looking at the graph i have a wider spread or torque. the graph above also not to good to comapre with however as its got power plots every 500rpm.... hes prob spent 500 on the manzel, 470 onb the remap, then ed want arp's for 70.
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by broster
quote: Originally posted by stubbsy
how much u spent on work done to engine fwazza??? this is the sort of power i will be happy with outa my gsi, also broster how much u spent?????
i spent a fair wack, but limiter with the lexmaul for peek power how ever looking at the graph i have a wider spread or torque. the graph above also not to good to comapre with however as its got power plots every 500rpm.... hes prob spent 500 on the manzel, 470 onb the remap, then ed want arp's for 70.
yeah but it records it on a WOT run though. the 500rpm points are just for reference
|
broster
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Dec 02
Location: Drives: E39
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
quote: Originally posted by broster
quote: Originally posted by stubbsy
how much u spent on work done to engine fwazza??? this is the sort of power i will be happy with outa my gsi, also broster how much u spent?????
i spent a fair wack, but limiter with the lexmaul for peek power how ever looking at the graph i have a wider spread or torque. the graph above also not to good to comapre with however as its got power plots every 500rpm.... hes prob spent 500 on the manzel, 470 onb the remap, then ed want arp's for 70.
yeah but it records it on a WOT run though. the 500rpm points are just for reference
i see i was being silly and thinking it was only taking a readign at every 500 rpm, please forgive me! lol
|
Rachel H
Member
Registered: 12th Nov 03
Location: Berks
User status: Offline
|
127 bhp with Mantzel and unichip, I would be very happy with that.
How much it set you back for the both?
|
Fraser Young
Member
Registered: 26th Dec 02
Location: Dundee City Drives: 58 Impreza WRX
User status: Offline
|
was 500 squid for mantzel and 350 for chip and mapping...
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
what was your before results
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
Where was that from Fwaza?
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Will be dastek in Dalgety Bay i assume.
|
Fraser Young
Member
Registered: 26th Dec 02
Location: Dundee City Drives: 58 Impreza WRX
User status: Offline
|
was dalgety bay aye
they didnt do before ones coz my plastic inlet jobbie was cracked at one side when went in (part of the reason for changing it to mantzel)
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
so they did not provide a before mapping run then. so you have no idea of the improvements made
|
Fraser Young
Member
Registered: 26th Dec 02
Location: Dundee City Drives: 58 Impreza WRX
User status: Offline
|
correctus, although was pretty much standard to begin with so i assume standard figures for before
[Edited on 07-11-2004 by Fwaza esquire]
|
Andy
Member
Registered: 28th Dec 99
Location: Cumbria, UK
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
thats a really shit graph
It's not shit Ross- look at the vertical scale; it's been expanded around 5 fold so that the whole vertical scale spans only 20ft/lb. That dip at 4500rpm may look big, but it's jack shit at 4ft/lb.
Redraw it on a normal vertical scale of 0 - 110ft/lb and the torque curve will look pretty much dead flat.
Fwaza - was it mapped by Gerry?
[Edited on 07-11-2004 by Andy]
|
Fraser Young
Member
Registered: 26th Dec 02
Location: Dundee City Drives: 58 Impreza WRX
User status: Offline
|
not really sure who did it to be honest was my first encounter with dastek at dalgety bay... Service was great though and fast
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Andy
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
thats a really shit graph
It's not shit Ross- look at the vertical scale; it's been expanded around 5 fold so that the whole vertical scale spans only 20ft/lb. That dip at 4500rpm may look big, but it's jack shit at 4ft/lb.
Redraw it on a normal vertical scale of 0 - 110ft/lb and the torque curve will look pretty much dead flat.
Fwaza - was it mapped by Gerry?
[Edited on 07-11-2004 by Andy]
I noticed that after
|