Nick-S
Member
Registered: 3rd Mar 04
Location: Leigh. Drives: RS Megane 230 F1 Team R26
User status: Offline
|
i thought you could get to almost 300 bhp without cams 
mind you, that charge cooler on the vx must be a hell of alot more efficient than an air to air intercooler.
[Edited on 11-02-2009 by GSi_16v]
|
Kezzz
Member
Registered: 8th Feb 09
Location: Ossett , West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
haha lol all this debating to show my m8s old z20 c car  be reet learning more bout tuning the z20 tho 
[Edited on 11-02-2009 by Kezzz]
|
FlamingCorsa
Member
Registered: 22nd Apr 03
Location: Shropshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by GSi_16v
i thought you could get to almost 300 bhp without cams
mind you, that charge cooler on the vx must be a hell of alot more efficient than an air to air intercooler.
[Edited on 11-02-2009 by GSi_16v]
not sure if its much more efficent its just only choice u have due to lack of space to fit a larger intercooler at the back there!
the map on the van that was done few months back is really smooth the vx220 is little more aggressive
|
Nick-S
Member
Registered: 3rd Mar 04
Location: Leigh. Drives: RS Megane 230 F1 Team R26
User status: Offline
|
As in abit more of an old school turbo power dalivary? nothing.... nothing... bang?
|
FlamingCorsa
Member
Registered: 22nd Apr 03
Location: Shropshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by GSi_16v
As in abit more of an old school turbo power dalivary? nothing.... nothing... bang?
the van is great, turbo comes in really smoothly! drives mroe like non turbo car!
weather its cos the vx is faster and rear wheel drive! but surtanly picks up far more agressivly than the van with newer map
|
