Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
1 (1) Real Madrid 365.8m
2 (2) Manchester Utd 324.8
3 (3) Barcelona 308.8
4 (7) Bayern Munich 295.3
5 (4) Chelsea 268.9
6 (5) Arsenal 264.4
7 (8) Liverpool 210.9
8 (6) AC Milan 209.5
9 (11) AS Roma 175.4
10 (9) Inter Milan 172.9
11 (12) Juventus 167.5
12 (13) Lyon 155.7
13 (16) Schalke 04 148.4
14 (10) Tottenham Hotspur 145.0
15 (15) SV Hamburg 127.9
16 (19) Marseille 126.8
17 (14) Newcastle United 125.6
18 (n/a) VfB Stuttgart 111.5
19 (n/a) Fenerbahce 111.3
20 (n/a) Manchester City 104.0
Arsenal above Liverpool 
[Edited on 12-02-2009 by Marc]
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Yeah have read the report, download it at http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/article/0,1002,cid=246693,00.html
Arsenal were bound to be ahead of us as their Matchday revenue is £94.6m compared to our £39.2m 
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
United
Matchday: £101.5m
Broadcasting: £91.6m
Commercial: £64m
Total: £257.1m
Chelsea
Matchday: £74.5m
Broadcasting: £77.4m
Commercial: £61m
Total: £212.9m
Arsenal
Matchday: £94.6m
Broadcasting: £70.4m
Commercial: £44.3m
Total: £209.3m
Liverpool
Matchday: £32.9m
Broadcasting: £76.3m
Commercial: £51.5m
Total: £167m
So a fairly obvious gulf from our matchday to everyone elses - if we matched Arsenals then our revenue would jump to £228.7m, which would be ahead of Chelsea - and thats before the extra commercial revenue having a larger stadium brings.
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
if you matched arsenals prices half of your fans couldnt afford it 
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
if you matched arsenals prices half of your fans couldnt afford it
Not really talking through increase in prices.
We could sell more than double the amount of corporate we can currently offer at Anfield, and thats where the money is. IIRC the new stadium has 3x as many boxes. For the average fan, we'll have an extra 13,000 over the Emirates so that would easily bring in enough to match (surpass?) Arsenals income and come close to Uniteds with a capacity of 76,000.
|
Danny P
Member
Registered: 20th Nov 02
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
Have they started on't new ground yet Cosmo?
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
They started the groundworks and a lot of the road networks by the ground have been improved - then put it on hold as no banks were lending the funds they need.
They are saying it is delayed by approx a year, but the cost of building materials has dropped a huge amount in this time and they think it has saved approx £100m off the cost already. Rumours Ive heard are that during this time they've been working with the architects to get the plans for the larger capacity done and ready in time to be submitted when construction does begin.
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
We're off due to the sterling:euro exchange rate apparently, which also attributed to Madrid being top and not Man United.
No surprises in it really.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
We're off due to the sterling:euro exchange rate apparently, which also attributed to Madrid being top and not Man United.
No surprises in it really.
Yep does mention this at the start, the rate fell by 15% since the last set were done.
Madrid are a huge amount above United though, so not sure if it would of made the difference between 1st and 2nd.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Infact, yes it would of. United would of turned over approx 382m euro off last years figures.
[Edited on 12-02-2009 by Cosmo]
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
Spurs drop down to 14th, Although as that report says once Spurs new stadium is built we should match Arsenals matchday takings.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Chelsea have released some more financial news...
The made a £65.7m loss last year. Its going down as the years before it was £74m, then £80.2m and then £140m
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
I've looked at the list a few times now and can't seem to see Luton? 
|
Jodi_the_g
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 01
Location: Washington D.C
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
I've looked at the list a few times now and can't seem to see Luton?
You had to hide it,
Otherwise the FA might dock you a further 10pts
and another 10 as your called town and they feel Luton has enough people to be a city.
On top of a further 50pts for people thinking the FA are wankers and not hating Luton
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Good job we hid it then 
|
Rob_Quads
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: southampton
User status: Offline
|
I wonder what the "Most profitable" list would look like.
Hearing that Chelsea lost 60 million last year means they would be no-where to be seen. They are making staggering amounts of payments to old coaches
|
