corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Mythbusters - Dirty Car vs Clean Car Episode.


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Mythbusters - Dirty Car vs Clean Car Episode.
Tiger
Member

Registered: 12th Jun 01
Location: Leicestershire Drives:Astra VXR
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 19:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

That snowplow one was mental! I couldnt believe how fast it hit the car!!
gavin18787
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 22nd Feb 05
Location: Basildon, Essex
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 19:43   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Interesting


Wonder if Ross Brawn was watching.......


Drives supercharged Tec with torque
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 19:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by andy1868
my boss was telling me about it, they made a car covered in dimples like a golf ball and the MPG increased as it goes through the air cleaner apparently


*Rushes outside with centre punch and tapping stick*
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
Even the mythbusters thought so and were amazed to be proven wrong!


Perhaps it's to do with some kind of small scale, yet beneficial surface turbulence.

I may be utterly wrong but I presume that the dirt/bumps set/s up dozens of (or more) tiny vortices on the surface of the car's body which 'lubricate' the passing air so to speak (a bit like a golf ball).
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
Cars aren't because it would be less safe for pedestrians and also more expensive to produce compared to the savings.


And surely, if they had a press to shape the body parts anyway, then they could have the press with dimples in it and that would be it?


I'd imagine that's just so it looks better, a dimply car would look wrong.


Imagine getting the dirt out of all those dimples too.
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Daveskater
Mythbusters ftw

They did find out that when the car was dirty it used more fuel though. Dirty and dimpled aren't the same.


Ah, bugger I thought that had explained why my RS is so fast, especially as it's always bloody filthy.

Was going to say, right, that's it, i'm never washing the car again. Cock it.
Tiger
Member

Registered: 12th Jun 01
Location: Leicestershire Drives:Astra VXR
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

They were big dimples though, like the kind the a bowling ball would have made numerous times.
ed
Member

Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

It's the same reason why you shouldn't have the ports in your head polished to a mirror finish.
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:39   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
They were big dimples though, like the kind the a bowling ball would have made numerous times.
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

They both explained and showed graphically in a wind tunnel how and why it works.
Daveskater
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 29th Apr 08
Location: Oxford, UK Drives: Jap wagon
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 20:49   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
They were big dimples though, like the kind the a bowling ball would have made numerous times.
Yup, they made them with tennis balls That's what it looked like they were doing anyway


Numberwang!

Originally posted by AlunJ
I like you Dave, you are a man of men

Originally Whatapp'd by Neo
Dave's maybe capable of a drive-by cuddle

Look at my pictures
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 21:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

It was a bowling ball they used iirc.
Daveskater
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 29th Apr 08
Location: Oxford, UK Drives: Jap wagon
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 21:58   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

They used this:



See here: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/22/mythbusters-golf-ball-like-dimpling-mpg/


Numberwang!

Originally posted by AlunJ
I like you Dave, you are a man of men

Originally Whatapp'd by Neo
Dave's maybe capable of a drive-by cuddle

Look at my pictures
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
6th Nov 09 at 22:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

That's right, they cut the stuff out didn't they instead of making imprints.
whitter45
Member

Registered: 15th Nov 02
Location: Norton
User status: Offline
10th Nov 09 at 16:27   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
But, like they said though, why arent cars and aeroplanes designed in this way?


for aircraft providing dimples on leading edges has proved slightly successful - however the boundary layer eventually degrades inducing drag and causing less lift

The golf ball has dimbles as the dimbles induces drag behind the ball as it travels through the air thus forcing the ball through the air like a vortex style

Did Aerospace at Uni and covered all this

Basically at this level of dynamics dimbles do not provide the gain required for aerodynemic lift and the boundary layer is sacrificed

next generation is ground force for aircraft - same principle applied to F1 and indycar aerodynamics - did this for my dissertation
1_Litre_Porsche_Beater
Member

Registered: 9th Apr 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
10th Nov 09 at 16:30   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Could this explain why women with a bit of celly/dimples can generally bounce better than others? Same principle eh.....
Ojc
Member

Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
10th Nov 09 at 16:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by 1_Litre_Porsche_Beater
Could this explain why women with a bit of celly/dimples can generally bounce better than others? Same principle eh.....


Ooohhh bbaaabbbyyy
SetH
Member

Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Online
10th Nov 09 at 16:38   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by 1_Litre_Porsche_Beater
Could this explain why women with a bit of celly/dimples can generally bounce better than others? Same principle eh.....


LMFAOAK47 you shall be commander of my HEFFER armies
RichR
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Oct 01
Location: Waterhouses, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
10th Nov 09 at 16:43   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the rougness factor helps to trap a boundary layer of air around the flow perimeter of the car; this boundary layer is actually more efficiently smooth than an polished surface. This is one of the reasons that most aeroplane wings are unpainted
RichR
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Oct 01
Location: Waterhouses, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
10th Nov 09 at 16:47   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by whitter45
quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
But, like they said though, why arent cars and aeroplanes designed in this way?


for aircraft providing dimples on leading edges has proved slightly successful - however the boundary layer eventually degrades inducing drag and causing less lift

The golf ball has dimbles as the dimbles induces drag behind the ball as it travels through the air thus forcing the ball through the air like a vortex style

Did Aerospace at Uni and covered all this

Basically at this level of dynamics dimbles do not provide the gain required for aerodynemic lift and the boundary layer is sacrificed

next generation is ground force for aircraft - same principle applied to F1 and indycar aerodynamics - did this for my dissertation



Did you study Wing in Ground effect vehicles, such as the Caspian Sea Monster; it was a phenommonal (sp) piece of engineering!

I'm currently looking at SWATH boats (Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull) which uses similar ground effect lift meaning the boat effectively needs less boat to float
whitter45
Member

Registered: 15th Nov 02
Location: Norton
User status: Offline
11th Nov 09 at 16:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by LiVe LeE
quote:
Originally posted by whitter45
quote:
Originally posted by Tiger
But, like they said though, why arent cars and aeroplanes designed in this way?


for aircraft providing dimples on leading edges has proved slightly successful - however the boundary layer eventually degrades inducing drag and causing less lift

The golf ball has dimbles as the dimbles induces drag behind the ball as it travels through the air thus forcing the ball through the air like a vortex style

Did Aerospace at Uni and covered all this

Basically at this level of dynamics dimbles do not provide the gain required for aerodynemic lift and the boundary layer is sacrificed

next generation is ground force for aircraft - same principle applied to F1 and indycar aerodynamics - did this for my dissertation



Did you study Wing in Ground effect vehicles, such as the Caspian Sea Monster; it was a phenommonal (sp) piece of engineering!

I'm currently looking at SWATH boats (Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull) which uses similar ground effect lift meaning the boat effectively needs less boat to float


no mate most of my ground effect work was on indy cars for the US

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Mythbusters - Dirty Car vs Clean Car Episode. 24 database queries in 0.0163329 seconds