johnny86
Premium Member
Registered: 15th Feb 10
Location: in a bus stop.
User status: Offline
|
How comes no one has put a thread up about this?
Personally I think he should of got more. But then again the women in question should of reported it when it happened.
Your views guys
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
He shouldn't be given the time of day. Dirty old pervert.
|
sc0ott
Member
Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
|
Dont know who he is and i dont care enough to start an internet convo. Thats my honest reason.
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
Couldn't happen to a nicer person.
Prison for years for being a sex pest?
Spin that you fat cunt.
[Edited on 06-05-2014 by Jambo]
|
MoesTavern
Member
Registered: 19th Jul 07
User status: Offline
|
I just don't see how there can be enough reliable evidence to convict any of these alleged 70's nonces.
Surely it's the alleged victim's word against his, and it all happened years ago?
|
johnny86
Premium Member
Registered: 15th Feb 10
Location: in a bus stop.
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by MoesTavern
I just don't see how there can be enough reliable evidence to convict any of these alleged 70's nonces.
Surely it's the alleged victim's word against his, and it all happened years ago?
We had a massive debate about this at work. One of the other blokes said the exact same as you.
Surely there has been some evidence we haven't seen to get all these convictions to stick
|
GB123
Premium Member
Registered: 21st Nov 11
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by MoesTavern
I just don't see how there can be enough reliable evidence to convict any of these alleged 70's nonces.
Surely it's the alleged victim's word against his, and it all happened years ago?
If all of the victim's accounts are similar without ever having met each other/heard each other's stories, it shows that he always operated the same way.
|
GB123
Premium Member
Registered: 21st Nov 11
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
I thought the maximum sentence under 70's guidelines was 2 years?
|
MoesTavern
Member
Registered: 19th Jul 07
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by GB123
quote:
Originally posted by MoesTavern
I just don't see how there can be enough reliable evidence to convict any of these alleged 70's nonces.
Surely it's the alleged victim's word against his, and it all happened years ago?
If all of the victim's accounts are similar without ever having met each other/heard each other's stories, it shows that he always operated the same way.
It's still all hearsay though, isn't it? how is any of it provable?
The jury are supposed to be convinced 'beyond reasonable doubt' before they can find him guilty aren't they?
I just don't get it
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
I think he has been done over. Suddenly deciding your were assaulted and making up excuses why it took 30yrs and a Jimmy Saville conspiracy before they report.
I feel sorry for the guy. But tbh i've not read anything about the case or findings.
|
nibnob21
Premium Member
Registered: 16th May 10
Location: South Derbyshire
User status: Offline
|
Couldn't have happened to a nicer person?
Makes it out as if you think he's a lovely guy.
MX5 Project Thread
|
