vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
The next IVF revolution?
New Scientist vol 178 issue 2394 - 10 May 2003, page 4
We could be on the verge of creating children from artificial eggs and sperm made in a lab dish, if work on mice can be repeated with human cells
THE mammalian egg, the cell that holds the secret to fertility, cloning and cell rejuvenation, has been created outside the body for the first time. And, New Scientist has learned, researchers are very close to creating sperm in a similar way.
The feat was accomplished with cells originally derived from mouse embryos, but most experts see no reason why the technique would not work with human embryonic stem cells too. If human eggs and sperm created this way are healthy - and it is a big if - the implications for reproductive technology and regenerative medicine would be immense.
Most immediately, a cheap, limitless supply of human eggs would greatly accelerate research in keys fields such as infertility and therapeutic cloning. "It's terrific," says Jose Cibelli of Michigan State University, the first scientist to publish details of attempts to clone human cells. "Eggs were one of those cell types we never thought we could produce." In the longer term, the applications might even include allowing infertile women or a pair of men to have their own children.
The key step in the formation of eggs and sperm is a form of cell division called meiosis, which produces cells with one set of chromosomes instead of two. Fertilisation then creates an embryo with the full two sets. There have been attempts to create artificial eggs or sperm by persuading normal cells to spit out one set of chromosomes (New Scientist, 22/29 December 2001, p 24), but embryos created from such cells never survive long.
This failure involves imprinting, the process whereby chemical changes to DNA turn some genes on or off. For an embryo to develop normally, its genome must have the correct imprinting pattern, which forms as eggs and sperm cells mature. You cannot create an embryo merely by adding the set of chromosomes from one egg to those of another, because paternal chromosomes have a different pattern of imprinting from maternal ones.
The method used to create eggs from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) was astonishingly simple. Instead of searching for chemicals that coax ESCs into becoming eggs, as many have attempted, Hans Schöler's team at the University of Pennsylvania just let mouse ESCs grow at a high density. In these conditions, some of the cells form floating aggregates most scientists would discard as useless debris. But team member Karin Hübner instead placed the clumps in new dishes.
"In four days they proliferated like crazy," says Schöler. The aggregates seem to behave like miniature ovarian follicles in which small cells nurture a bigger cell that forms an egg.
Further studies by the team revealed that these egg-like cells form by meiosis, and switch on the same key genes as normal eggs as they develop. The follicle-like structures make hormones such as oestradiol in amounts that rise and fall on the same timescale as the menstrual cycle. Adding a hormone called gonadotrophin triggers the expulsion of the egg cell into the culture dish, mimicking ovulation (Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1083452).
Intriguingly, eggs form from both female (XX) and male (XY) ESCs. That is because mammalian germ cells will go down the egg route unless signals produced by the testes tell the cells to become sperm.
This is also why getting ESCs to turn into sperm is more complex. However, a team led by Toshiaki Noce at the Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences in Tokyo may already have succeeded. According to a document found by New Scientist, the team allowed male mouse ESCs to develop spontaneously into various different types of cell, and picked out those that had begun turning into germ cells.
These cells do not develop far in culture, but when Noce's team transplanted them into testicular tissue he found after three months that they had undergone meiosis and formed what appeared to be normal sperm.
Both teams have yet to perform the next, crucial step: fertilising the artificial eggs with normal sperm, or using the artificial sperm to fertilise normal eggs. Since Schöler's egg have a thinner outer layer and are more fragile than normal eggs, they could be harder to fertilise.
The big question is whether the resulting embryos will have normal imprinting and develop into healthy baby mice. "There is always a possibility that the imprints would not be normal," says Azim Surani of Cambridge University.
He points out that imprinting can be affected simply by growing cells in the lab. Even children born through normal IVF may have a higher risk of certain defects. "You could create lots of abnormalities," warns Surani.
But if the animals are normal, the race will be on to create artificial human egg and sperm cells this way. It is likely to be much harder with human cells. Attempts to obtain human eggs simply by growing slices of ovarian tissue have failed, and the only mouse created from an egg obtained this way, dubbed Eggbert, was sickly and died young. It will also be slow: it takes up to six months for a human egg to mature.
But if it can be done, the possibilities are astounding. In cloning, for instance, there are massive problems with imprinting. When a nucleus is transferred to an empty egg, chemicals in the egg seem to alter the imprinting, "reprogramming" the genome to ensure the right genes are expressed in the growing embryo. But the process is far from perfect, and many cloned embryos die or give rise to animals with major defects.
The offspring of cloned animals, however, seem to be normal, prompting some cloning experts to suggest that the formation of eggs and sperm corrects any lingering imprinting defects. It might be possible to take an individual's cell, create ESCs from it by therapeutic cloning, and then derive healthy eggs or sperm from them for use in IVF (see Graphic).
The most obvious application would be to treat infertile women who cannot produce any eggs suitable for IVF, or men who cannot produce sperm. And because male ESCs can be turned into eggs as well as sperm, two men could both be biological parents of a child, with the help of a surrogate mother; two out of three of such children would be male. The technique would not allow two women to have children together, though, as female ECSs lack the Y chromosome, without which sperm cells appear unable to form.
While it sounds far-fetched, the method would even allow "self-fertilisation" by a man. Such a child would not be an identical clone of its parent, as it would have lost some of his genetic diversity. Even more controversially, it might be possible to genetically engineer children by modifying ESCs in culture and then deriving and selecting sperm and eggs carrying the modifications.
For now, the potential risks of the technology rule out such uses, Surani says. And Schöler agrees. "The one thing I don't want is that the oocytes be used to make humans," he says.
Yet while some countries have regulations that would prohibit the use of the technology, in the US and other countries there is far less control of IVF clinics. Now may be the time to consider the potential benefits and concerns, before experiments even begin with human cells. "It's always good to have these kinds of debates of potential ethical issues," says Surani.
|
ajscorsa
Member
Registered: 30th Apr 02
Location: Perceton, North Ayrshire
User status: Offline
|
what does it mean i aint readin all that so put it down in lamen terms please
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
It means that if you take it in the arse from another bloke you will get pregnant.
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
Mean they are twisting the way human life works.
Idiots.
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
It means that the world is turning itself inside out.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
quote:
It means that if you take it in the arse from another bloke you will get pregnant.
LMFAO 
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Daimo B
Mean they are twisting the way human life works.
Idiots.
no it's fucking cool. two woman cannot do that though
|
Tam the diesel man
Member
Registered: 31st Jul 01
Location: Portsmouth
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
two men could both be biological parents of a child, with the help of a surrogate mother; two out of three of such children would be male.
how could two out of three be male and one female??
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
it basically says you can mak eggs from normal cells and you could there for introduce a normal sperm cell during IVF to the new egg and make an embryo. also this egg cell could be transformed into a sperm cell meaning two mean could have a baby.
the main reason for doing such a thing would be to make embreyos rather than taking them from woman you could grow your own.
|
LoudandProud
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 01
Location: Stanway, Essex
User status: Offline
|
It means that vibrio and ojc can have a child they can call there own
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
yes if we so wanted or Daimo could have clone of himself to fuck
|
Bram
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
This is old news-
Three men and a Baby?????
Three men and a Little Lady???
That was the 80's!!!
|
slate58
Member
Registered: 16th Mar 03
Location: Mansfield
User status: Offline
|
Only one prob, what if kid ends up with 2 Y chromosomes, then ur gonna hav all sort of hell breakin loose! Cant agree with messin with nature in that way, IVF is fair enough but this is goin just a bit too far.
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
thats not a problem. not going to happen
|
Ben
Banned
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
This post is sick , imagine a world full of gays , i mean WTF , that wud be well bad !!! ps, how da fcuk to two gay tw@ts have a baby or 3 whateva . that shunt even be tested on mice , i mean why da fcuk wud u want to even invent it , OUR WORLD IS TURNING GAY !!!!!!!!!!!!! sick:boggle@
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
no. being gay is not just genetics, it's your environment as well.
|
Ben
Banned
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
wtf , gay is sick man ,dont giv a shit ,is bloody gross! taking it upp di batty hole is a no no , exit hole stays exit for me thankyou!!!
|
