greycorsa
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
User status: Offline
|
Saxo beats it hands down. just driven my mates, quite impressed really. altho it was the 100bhp 99> model. wud b better to compare it with the pre 99 90bhp really......
handlings well better than a corsa tho. heard so many comments about the corsa ones being so much better, but i now gather they were all biased opinions.
ive driven owned a corsa for about a year, driven a saxo for half an hour, saxo wins. no bias.
|
L33 LEG
Banned
Registered: 6th Jan 03
Location: Blackburn . Drove: Dimma Saxo VTR
User status: Offline
|
i think it is obvious in everyones mind that a VTR wud beat a sport (if its a 1.4 ur talking about)
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
yeah standard for standard the saxo is a better car.
|
greycorsa
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
User status: Offline
|
its a bit difficult to compare really coz theyre hardly like for like, 1.4 16v, 1.6 8v, but the bhp is similar. saxo just seems so much better. handlings great.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
until you reach 80 and watch the panels peel off like an orange
[Edited on 10-09-2004 by Cybermonkey24]
|
Matt H
Member
Registered: 11th Sep 01
Location: South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
ive never lost a race to saxo
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
mate jus got a 02 VTR yest and i feel it will pish over my sport (1.4). but like u say, there not really similar cars, different CC so its not a good comparison. a good comparison would be:
clio 1.4 16v
corsa 1.4 16v
mg zr 1.4 16v
polo 1.4 16v
corsa gsi 1.6 16v
VTR 1.6 8v
VTS 1.6 16v
106 GTi 1.6 16v
but il give me mate a go against him in mine and wel c wot happens. its quick over 80 i tel ya, had it to 123 today !
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Dave17
mate jus got a 02 VTR yest and i feel it will pish over my sport (1.4). but like u say, there not really similar cars, different CC so its not a good comparison. a good comparison would be:
clio 1.4 16v
corsa 1.4 16v
mg zr 1.4 16v
polo 1.4 16v
corsa gsi 1.6 16v
VTR 1.6 8v
VTS 1.6 16v
106 GTi 1.6 16v
but il give me mate a go against him in mine and wel c wot happens. its quick over 80 i tel ya, had it to 123 today !
You cannot compare a corsa 1.6 to a VTS or GTi either, we all know the french tin cans are faster and handle better VTR's are easy meat for corsa 1.6's though. saying that, i could keep side by side with a VTS in 3rd gear right up to about 85, and then it was pulling away.
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
if you notice i made a point of engine groups not basing the grouping on performace. i was making a point of a 1.4 corsa shoudl even be compared coz its obviously gona be slower coz it is in a different class
|
the_legend_of_yrag
Member
Registered: 7th Jul 03
Location: Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
|
so your putting a 1.4 r5gtt in that class aswell then?
|
Davido
Member
Registered: 18th Aug 03
Location: Reading,Berks
User status: Offline
|
raced a few vtrs in my 1.6 16v sport n even now with 17's on still cnt really get near us plus driven many vtr & vts n they r horrible shit feel cheap little cars
|
goldfish
Banned
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: we have a grass in CS he is a chav
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Nismo
yeah standard for standard the saxo is a better car.
I disagree. just because th saxo may handle better and quicker to 60mph does not make it a better car
|
Ryan L
Member
Registered: 4th Mar 03
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by goldfish
quote: Originally posted by Nismo
yeah standard for standard the saxo is a better car.
I disagree. just because th saxo may handle better and quicker to 60mph does not make it a better car
go on then and make a case for it being a better car as i don't think you have one
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
1.4 16v Sport once moving can keep up with 90bhp VTR's, the 100bhp VTR's are a lot faster IMO.
At 70mph plus, the Corsa 1.6 16v can keep up with a VTS/GTi.
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
Guess what? It depends who's driving them
|
Lee 16v
Member
Registered: 25th Jun 04
Location: Maidstone Drives: Corsa 2.0 16v
User status: Offline
|
When i had my saxo with standard sus i felt alot safer putting it into a corner quick-ish, on standard suspension I was frightened for my life with the corsa so i went n bought dampers n springs n lowered it 60mm
|
RichiesCorsa
Member
Registered: 15th Feb 04
Location: Rural Perthshire
User status: Offline
|
I have driven a saxo vtr once and wasnt very impressed. Interior felt very flimsy and handbrake was like a dildo. and i cudnt get ma feet in2 the pedals properly, but in time i mite have become used to it.
as for if they are faster, just look at the typical person that drives most of them.
|
LoudandProud
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 01
Location: Stanway, Essex
User status: Offline
|
I have also drove and raced one in my 106 xsi 1.6 8v wasquicker than a VTS too pile of poo IMO
[Edited on 10-09-2004 by LoudandProud]
|
Tom_1.216v
Member
Registered: 16th Apr 04
Location: SOUTHAMPTON
User status: Offline
|
i made the choice of getting a corsa over a saxo cos all round it's better yeah maybe there quicker and handle better but put a suspenion kit on a corsa and your away!
also corsas have look nicer interior, air con, deadlocks and it don't take two seconds to brake into. yeah also corsa b's are old but still look nicer done up than a saxo but thats my point of view!
Saxo's SUKS
|
goldfish
Banned
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: we have a grass in CS he is a chav
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Ryan L
quote: Originally posted by goldfish
quote: Originally posted by Nismo
yeah standard for standard the saxo is a better car.
I disagree. just because th saxo may handle better and quicker to 60mph does not make it a better car
go on then and make a case for it being a better car as i don't think you have one
saxo is has worse build quality, can only be driven with people with small feet, has no rear head rests, is small compared to a corsa in terms of rear leg room and boot space, has old spec engines do you want me to go on
|
sassyminx
Member
Registered: 10th Jan 04
Location: Hartlepool Drives: Cossie
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Dave17
mate jus got a 02 VTR yest and i feel it will pish over my sport (1.4). but like u say, there not really similar cars, different CC so its not a good comparison. a good comparison would be:
corsa gsi 1.6 16v
VTR 1.6 8v- no bother can lash em
VTS 1.6 16v- beat 2 tho prolly shudnt have
106 GTi 1.6 16v- never been daft enuf to race one- and wud never win
but il give me mate a go against him in mine and wel c wot happens. its quick over 80 i tel ya, had it to 123 today !
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
I drove a 100bhp Saxo VTR and it felt really breathless compared to my SXi, might have been something to do with the 8v setup.
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
Remeber that a Saxo may be better at a quater mile (great) but you will have to live with the disgusting interior. Mmmmmmm shiney black plastic door cards - my favorite!
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by 1800ed
Remeber that a Saxo may be better at a quater mile (great) but you will have to live with the disgusting interior. Mmmmmmm shiney black plastic door cards - my favorite!
And lovely spilt paint pattern on the seats
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice!
|
Ryan L
Member
Registered: 4th Mar 03
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by goldfish
quote: Originally posted by Ryan L
quote: Originally posted by goldfish
quote: Originally posted by Nismo
yeah standard for standard the saxo is a better car.
I disagree. just because th saxo may handle better and quicker to 60mph does not make it a better car
go on then and make a case for it being a better car as i don't think you have one
saxo is has worse build quality, can only be driven with people with small feet, has no rear head rests, is small compared to a corsa in terms of rear leg room and boot space, has old spec engines do you want me to go on
yes please as corsa b's do not have rear headrests, and their engines are older than the saxo range, i have size 9 feet and have no problems don't know about clowns though) and boot space and rear leg room are almost the same
|