corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » 106 Quicksilver vs Saxo VTR


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author 106 Quicksilver vs Saxo VTR
Jamescorsa97
Member

Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Although there is quite a differnce in bhp:

106 - 75bhp
Saxo(51 reg) - 100bhp

The 106 is also a 100kg lighter and the 106 is a 16v as to the VTR is a 8V.

Would there be much difference in performance??

If you were going to buy one which would you go for?

Rob B
Member

Registered: 8th Jan 04
Location: Area Motorsport Drives: Race EP3
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

VTR mate, will be alot quicker than the 106
SJW
Banned

Registered: 8th Jul 05
Location: Malvern
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:29   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

no the 106 quicksilver is 8v mate
Edd
Member

Registered: 8th Nov 04
Location: Glasgow
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quicksiler is 8v would go for the vtr mate,the only 106 worth owning is the 106 gti
Jamescorsa97
Member

Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Ah right, i was arguing my point last night about the VTR with the guy that was posted on here a few days back that does Micra's up. He was saying the 106 would have been better. I'll go VTR then.
Sly_SRi
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 9th Apr 04
Location: Reading, UK Drives: Corsa C
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:48   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quicksilvers are no different to standard 106 1.4's, they're not very quick. the vtr would destroy it...


Corsa C Z20Let

Black Sleeper Turbo Project
Wrighty
Member

Registered: 28th Feb 04
Location: Howden
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:51   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

yeah but for what they are the 106's are quite nippy

personally wouldnt own either
Rob B
Member

Registered: 8th Jan 04
Location: Area Motorsport Drives: Race EP3
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 08:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Well im not saying i beat it but i keep up with a 106 quicksilver around here cant pass it though and thats in a 1.2 16v
Jamescorsa97
Member

Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 09:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Deffo put me off it lol.
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 09:51   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

people are sayin quicksilvers are slow, i think they need to take a ride in my car it keeps up with vtrs so if u wanna buy mine u can looks better than a saxo and its as quick and cheaper as its a smaller engine

[Edited on 04-10-2005 by Corsa_Carl]
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 09:56   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

ohw ive just realised who u r, wayne was telling me about u. if u wanna see ma car or nethin just let me or him know
Jamescorsa97
Member

Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 10:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Corsa_Carl
people are sayin quicksilvers are slow, i think they need to take a ride in my car it keeps up with vtrs so if u wanna buy mine u can looks better than a saxo and its as quick and cheaper as its a smaller engine

[Edited on 04-10-2005 by Corsa_Carl]


This is what i was talking about

[Edited on 04-10-2005 by Jamescorsa97]
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 10:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

yeah i no lol
Jamescorsa97
Member

Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 10:10   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Whats mods has it got?
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 10:11   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

hav a luk on the link
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 10:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

there is a few probz with engine as i found out last night !!! and a dent in the boot as u can see ! but its gettin a full service and totally fixed so it will b running perfect on thursday and the dent fixin as soon as thts done

[Edited on 04-10-2005 by Corsa_Carl]
stuartmitchell
Member

Registered: 24th Apr 04
Location: Kirkliston, Edinburgh
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 11:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

there both french so they will both break, the pug will probably break first but the vtr is a chav motor

tough pick but I would take the quicksilver
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 11:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

too right u wud pick the 106, especially my quicky lol
Tom
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 11:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I'd have the vtr, for the simple fact it's quicker full stop.
broster
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 6th Dec 02
Location: Drives: E39
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 11:50   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

pug for me.... looks so much nicer than a vtr...corsa_carl's one looks very nice!
Corsa_Carl
Member

Registered: 8th Oct 04
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 12:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

its mine we r talkin about . . . ive heard he is either wanting to buy mine or a saxo vtr.

im not just sayin this coz its my car and im wantin to sell it but if i was neone else i wud buy mine, as i say ive kept up with vtr's so speed isnt that diff is it and the looks r alot better

[Edited on 04-10-2005 by Corsa_Carl]
Jamescorsa97
Member

Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 13:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Corsa_Carl
its mine we r talkin about . . . ive heard he is either wanting to buy mine or a saxo vtr.

[Edited on 04-10-2005 by Corsa_Carl]


This is correct.
Corsa E-Tec
Member

Registered: 4th Feb 04
Location: Stevenage Drives: Leon Cupra
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 13:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

pug for me too
Tom
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 13:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

How does your quicksilver keep up with a vtr with 25bhp more power than it how is a 106 100kg's lighter than a saxo fffs
Fear
Member

Registered: 20th Nov 02
Location: Down off the hill
User status: Offline
4th Oct 05 at 13:29   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

mate had a 1.4 XS which is same as quicksilver and neither could pass the other and would be side by side not moving, he then added a viper and exhaust and got an extra 10bhp and could move past me then!

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » 106 Quicksilver vs Saxo VTR 23 database queries in 0.0145259 seconds