C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/8546528.stm
Should never have been allowed out in the first place.
|
Matt L
Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
User status: Offline
|
now why cant we just kill them seriously is just a waste of time and money spent on them as he obviously learnt nothing first time round so he aint going to learn anything this time.
honestly i wish they would bring back capital punishment would soon start cutting down crime/benifits [/stereotyping]
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Cool.
|
Jay
Member
Registered: 26th Sep 04
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
Agree, should never of been released, scumbag.
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
human waste. Dispose of immedietely.
|
shibby
Member
Registered: 6th Apr 08
User status: Offline
|
sick in the head.
Should let all the really abd oens fight each other to the death, with a promise of freedom for the winner. then shoot the badger anyway,
er on a more serious note, anybody know what he got put back inside for?
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
told ya willay....
|
N16K
Member
Registered: 4th Oct 04
Location: Belfast, NI Drives: Corsa D SRi, Tuned Cooper S, B
User status: Offline
|
Good news, how long till the other one!
|
MarkSport
Member
Registered: 22nd May 09
User status: Offline
|
Fucking Scum...I'd love to have him infront of me whilst i'm holding a crowbar or something that will make him pay for such a sick crime and thinking he could get away with it.
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
thought it was going to be terry 
|
Rich H
Member
Registered: 26th Oct 05
Location: West Sussex Drives: E46 M3
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ben G
thought it was going to be terry
So did I  
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by shibby
on a more serious note, anybody know what he got put back inside for?
violating the terms of his life licence. basically because they served the minimum term and the parole board agreed to release them early, they were released on life licence. it's a way of re-incarcerating them if they do anything to make them seem that they were not fully rehabilitated.
to me that means that the pricks who said he wasn't a danger to society fucked up as he has clearly done something to prove otherwise. Unfortunately we have never known the new identity of these fuckers but we may find out what this particular sicko is now called.
for any of the younger members who may have missed most of the details there are in depth reports on the net describing the events of that day. it's a little upsetting but i feel it is necessary to read it so you can appreciate the level of sicko we are talking about.
[Edited on 02-03-2010 by C2RL R]
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Rich H
quote:
Originally posted by Ben G
thought it was going to be terry
So did I
thats why i just wrote "Venables"! thought it may get more views that way
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
He served his time in a cushy little youth prison and then released on our expense to continue in anonymity.
This is what the electric chair was created for, personally would of been happy to put him as a kid on there and pulled the lever myself.
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
that would never have happened even if we had harsher punishments for criminals. i personally would have happily waited the 8 years for them to turn 18 then watch them fry.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by C2RL R
that would never have happened even if we had harsher punishments for criminals. i personally would have happily waited the 8 years for them to turn 18 then watch them fry.
You you arent tough enough to kill a kid then....
ah wait actually yeah.
|
Limecat
Banned
Registered: 25th Jun 05
Location: The Internet
User status: Offline
|
"He could have been recalled on licence if he committed an offence, it could be that he returned to Merseyside, it could be he might have approached the family.
"There is no evidence so far that he did any of these things."
Try reading things people? I recall the BBC have tried to blow up similar things in the past to be more than what they actually are?
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
in all fairness those parts you quoted weren't in the article when i posted it earlier.
|
SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
Terry?! 
|
Limecat
Banned
Registered: 25th Jun 05
Location: The Internet
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by C2RL R
in all fairness those parts you quoted weren't in the article when i posted it earlier.
I first read it when it was about 4 posts in and they were there then. I couldn't be arsed to piss about as I was on an iPhone at the time.
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
they definately weren't there when i posted it. i heard it then read the article and posted it here.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by LETGSI16V
"He could have been recalled on licence if he committed an offence, it could be that he returned to Merseyside, it could be he might have approached the family.
"There is no evidence so far that he did any of these things."
Try reading things people? I recall the BBC have tried to blow up similar things in the past to be more than what they actually are?
Im sorry? But who the fuck cares if all he did was go back to Merseyside or approach his family? And the BBC may not have evidence, but they havent sent him back with just a rumour saying he did it.
Fact is he was an evil fucking kid who knew what he was doing when he kidnapped a little kid in a shopping centre and abused and killed him. The fact he was released at all is amazing. If the conditions of his release meant not returning to an area or approaching his family then so fucking be it. If he did either (again he hasnt been sent back with no evidence) then he should be back in there.
|
Limecat
Banned
Registered: 25th Jun 05
Location: The Internet
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
Fact is he was an evil fucking kid who knew what he was doing when he kidnapped a little kid in a shopping centre and abused and killed him. The fact he was released at all is amazing. If the conditions of his release meant not returning to an area or approaching his family then so fucking be it. If he did either (again he hasnt been sent back with no evidence) then he should be back in there.
I am not condoning it but that alone would show more sign of pootential rehabiliation than anything else.
No facts are known yet, that is my point.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by LETGSI16V
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
Fact is he was an evil fucking kid who knew what he was doing when he kidnapped a little kid in a shopping centre and abused and killed him. The fact he was released at all is amazing. If the conditions of his release meant not returning to an area or approaching his family then so fucking be it. If he did either (again he hasnt been sent back with no evidence) then he should be back in there.
I am not condoning it but that alone would show more sign of pootential rehabiliation than anything else.
No facts are known yet, that is my point.
No, the story states that he has been sent back, that indicates a court has found him guilty of something and therefore has gone back to prison. Now you have quoted a part of the article which is purely the BBC guessing at what this could be for, hence why they say no evidence is available as yet.
Now if we go by just what you quoted he has been sent back with no evidence and purely on rumour, this obviously isnt true!
|
Limecat
Banned
Registered: 25th Jun 05
Location: The Internet
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
quote:
Originally posted by LETGSI16V
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
Fact is he was an evil fucking kid who knew what he was doing when he kidnapped a little kid in a shopping centre and abused and killed him. The fact he was released at all is amazing. If the conditions of his release meant not returning to an area or approaching his family then so fucking be it. If he did either (again he hasnt been sent back with no evidence) then he should be back in there.
I am not condoning it but that alone would show more sign of pootential rehabiliation than anything else.
No facts are known yet, that is my point.
No, the story states that he has been sent back, that indicates a court has found him guilty of something and therefore has gone back to prison. Now you have quoted a part of the article which is purely the BBC guessing at what this could be for, hence why they say no evidence is available as yet.
Now if we go by just what you quoted he has been sent back with no evidence and purely on rumour, this obviously isnt true!
No Cosmo, I quoted something by his solicitor that was posted on the BBC site.
You have also hugely failed to read the thread. It VERY clearly says 'recalled', it doesn't say convicted which is what would happen in a Court. So it doesn't indicate a Court has found him guilty, it states he has been recalled. Please don't do your normal thing of trying to make up facts in a thread.
|
