N3CRO
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
|
http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=27935
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Boooooo
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
Read that earlier 
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
thats a bit of a shitter. i can live with it if it makes the third film a bit more accurate compared to the animated series. she didn't exactly play a great part, she was just mega fit. there's always google image search.
|
LeeM
Member
Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
shame
|
Tommy
Member
Registered: 24th Aug 00
Location: Essex, Colchester
User status: Offline
|
Not worth seing then
|
djgritt
Premium Member
Registered: 1st Nov 07
Location: Dorset Drives: Focus ST / Hyundai i20N
User status: Offline
|
Gemma Fucking Arterton?!
Hmmm, not quite Le Fox, but, well, doable... 
|
nathy_87
Member
Registered: 14th Aug 08
Location: West Mids. Drives: Škoda Fabia VRS 5J
User status: Offline
|
makes no difference to me.
Edit; Because I wont be watching the film anyway.
[Edited on 21-05-2010 by 5dr corsa-3dr_polo]
|
Ingham
Banned
Registered: 9th May 08
Location: Burnley, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
I can live with that, looking forward to T3!
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
She's a terrible actress and giving her a bigger role in Transformers 2 was a major setback for the film.
They will do better without her.
|
noshua
Member
Registered: 19th Nov 08
User status: Offline
|
First one was acceptable, second film was absolute tosh.
No loss then.
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by noshua
First one was acceptable, second film was absolute tosh.
No loss then.
WTF!
Have you seen it in 1080p? The fighting scene in the woods...FULL IMAX HD...pure epic! 
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
The second one was garbage.
|
Ian W
Member
Registered: 8th Nov 03
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
The second one was garbage.
Even its stars have come out and said it was rubbish
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
quote:
Originally posted by noshua
First one was acceptable, second film was absolute tosh.
No loss then.
WTF!
Have you seen it in 1080p? The fighting scene in the woods...FULL IMAX HD...pure epic!
How the hell could seeing it in full HD make any difference at all to the quality of the movie? 
I swear people are starting to loose their common sense and just eat up everything labelled with "HD" as good.
|
Ingham
Banned
Registered: 9th May 08
Location: Burnley, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Balling
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
quote:
Originally posted by noshua
First one was acceptable, second film was absolute tosh.
No loss then.
WTF!
Have you seen it in 1080p? The fighting scene in the woods...FULL IMAX HD...pure epic!
How the hell could seeing it in full HD make any difference at all to the quality of the movie?
I swear people are starting to loose their common sense and just eat up everything labelled with "HD" as good.
The quality of the picture & sound can make the movie tbh.
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Balling
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
quote:
Originally posted by noshua
First one was acceptable, second film was absolute tosh.
No loss then.
WTF!
Have you seen it in 1080p? The fighting scene in the woods...FULL IMAX HD...pure epic!
How the hell could seeing it in full HD make any difference at all to the quality of the movie?
I swear people are starting to loose their common sense and just eat up everything labelled with "HD" as good.
Because it does...if a movie looks fantastic but has a weak storyline I still dont mind watching it as its pleasing to the eyes...
Its personal preference anyway I thought the story was fine.
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jonny Ingham
The quality of the picture & sound can make the movie tbh.
No.
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Avatar was good, the actual film was average.
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
quote:
Originally posted by Balling
How the hell could seeing it in full HD make any difference at all to the quality of the movie?
Because it does...
Oh, yeah! I see your point now!
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
Its personal preference anyway I thought the story was fine.
Sure, not everyone will like the movie. But watching a film that's boring as fuck just because you think the visual quality is top notch is a joke to me.
Not saying that Revenge of the Fallen is boring as fuck, just stating that the visuals can in fact not save a movie, that has nothing else going for it.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
The action in the second one was too quick and blurred. The storyline was weak. The film made very little sense.
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Balling
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
quote:
Originally posted by Balling
How the hell could seeing it in full HD make any difference at all to the quality of the movie?
Because it does...
Oh, yeah! I see your point now!
Well tbh you should of said 'make any difference to the quality of the STORYLINE' because in reality if the movie looks and sounds good then it does make a difference.
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
if the movie looks and sounds good then it does make a difference.
Agreed, not in every case, but some films can look stunning and the storyline doesn't really matter.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
But when the story is as weak as Transformers 2 it does matter. As despite what was going on with the action I was still left confused and disappointed. It had nothing on the first film.
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
If a film looks terrible it can make a difference, as it kills the realism. If it looks stunning it still has to be good to actually keep the viewer interested.
Avatar held high on the visuals for almost 30 minutes. Then the lame an predictive story shone through and the special effects did fuck all to keep me interested.
I guess we're back at the matter of personal preference. I personally will need more than aesthetics to keep me interested.
Fuck putting on a bluray of a pretty picture and just staring at the marvellous high resolution...
[Edited on 21-05-2010 by Balling]
|
