ianofbhills
Member
Registered: 10th Feb 01
Location: newcastle
User status: Offline
|
Reckon he's going to jail for this seems slightly OTT data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ef79/4ef7951c6dc415123914fa5032d7aff4ffa4ca76" alt=""
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P8UwpewAro
|
pow
Premium Member
Registered: 11th Sep 06
Location: Hazlemere, Buckinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
Fuck me he went down hard
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
Looks to me as if the stupid cunt picking a fight with him deserved it.
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
Don't think the bouncer did anything wrong tbh
If he'd kicked him while he was down, then maybe so, but the other guy was the aggressor, bouncer was protecting himself/his place of work
[Edited on 13-10-2013 by Cavey]
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
Also, he didn't beat the crap out of someone, just slammed him once.
|
Daniel_Corsa
Premium Member
Registered: 21st Apr 04
Location: Wigton, Cumbria
User status: Offline
|
Don't mess with Geordie bouncers.
April '06' Corsasport Feature Car | Aug '08' Total Vauxhall Feature Car | Spring '09' Fast Car Feature Car
|
ianofbhills
Member
Registered: 10th Feb 01
Location: newcastle
User status: Offline
|
Yer total mug for picking a fight with the doorman in the first place but that bouncer is supposed to be a professional he's already thrown the prick guy out thats his job done. The bouncer has totally seen red and in a rage went way OTT and slammed the kid into the pavement there was no need for that imo. Might just be the way the video is edited but the bouncer strikes first with the kick.
|
mantamark
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 06
Location: Northumberland
User status: Offline
|
Thought they were meant to use minimal force? This was from last week as its been on the news etc round here. I just think if the second bouncer had stepped in and they could have subdued him without smashing him off the floor.
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
oooft
|
Jimbothebarbarian
Member
Registered: 19th Apr 07
Location: Cumbria..........drunk..
User status: Offline
|
Meh, seen worse...
|
Lee_fr200
Member
Registered: 8th May 11
Location: West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
Guy deserved it,
|
Skylined
Member
Registered: 27th Sep 05
Location: Sideways, Surrey
User status: Offline
|
Looks horrendous, slamming someone head first into the pavement can break a neck or give someone brain damage.
|
dragon2309
Member
Registered: 1st Mar 09
Location: Strood, Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Skylined
Looks horrendous, slamming someone head first into the pavement can break a neck or give someone brain damage.
break his neck will probably do the world a favour, and brain damage probably wouldnt affect him much, picking fights with bouncers, obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed to begin with.
|
Wrighty
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
Location: Howden
User status: Offline
|
that'l teach ya pwned
|
fred7
Member
Registered: 17th May 04
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Skylined
Looks horrendous, slamming someone head first into the pavement can break a neck or give someone brain damage.
Must of been watching a different video to me because it wasnt head first? The kid had his fists up to the bouncer before he tried to swipe his leg.
|
Tiger
Member
Registered: 12th Jun 01
Location: Leicestershire Drives:Astra VXR
User status: Offline
|
Excessive use of force for sure, a jab to the nose would have been less serious in my opinion.
|
DaveyLC
Member
Registered: 8th Oct 08
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
He's a Doorman not a 'Street'-man.. He'll be in the shit for that excessive use of force.
.....But damn he's a double hard bastard!
|
spencer88
Member
Registered: 6th Oct 08
Location: cornwall
User status: Offline
|
Get some!
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
Excessive use of force as if he has time to stop and think how hard he is allowed to hit the guy standing trying to take his head off in the street.
|
DaveyLC
Member
Registered: 8th Oct 08
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Hammer
Excessive use of force as if he has time to stop and think how hard he is allowed to hit the guy standing trying to take his head off in the street.
You've answered your own question there, the guy was standing in the street.. He is a bouncer/doorman NOT the police, he has no right to restrain/touch people in the street, he is there to protect the private property he has been paid to protect.
P.S. I'm not saying the guy didn't deserve it
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by DaveyLC
You've answered your own question there, the guy was standing in the street..
From the video the guy was acting aggressively and potentially posing a threat, hence the doorman acted in self defense. Has nothing to do with his job.
Whether he should have been able to subdue the guy more discreetly/efficiently is a different matter, but I certainly don't see a use of excessive force.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8e02/f8e027a0fb3e90371ba92b04680f19cd3ec83ea0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8e02/f8e027a0fb3e90371ba92b04680f19cd3ec83ea0" alt=""
|
DaveyLC
Member
Registered: 8th Oct 08
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
Self defence or not, he's a 'professional' who deals with the public and is expected to act in a certain manor.. Body slamming someone half his size into the pavement (albeit massively entertaining) is not part of the job description.
|
Gary
Premium Member
Registered: 22nd Nov 06
Location: West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
The other lad that walked over should have helped restrain him.
THe cunt did deserve to get smashed though
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by DaveyLC
quote: Originally posted by Hammer
Excessive use of force as if he has time to stop and think how hard he is allowed to hit the guy standing trying to take his head off in the street.
You've answered your own question there, the guy was standing in the street.. He is a bouncer/doorman NOT the police, he has no right to restrain/touch people in the street, he is there to protect the private property he has been paid to protect.
P.S. I'm not saying the guy didn't deserve it
I didn't ask a question let alone answer it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bf47/8bf476d5bb1f768262e8393cb908adb93dd8383c" alt=""
At the point the guy becomes physically aggressive towards the bouncer, the fact the guy is a bouncer becomes a side-note. He has every right to defend himself as a person, not a doorman.
|
richc
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 07
Location: Ilkeston
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Hammer
quote: Originally posted by DaveyLC
quote: Originally posted by Hammer
Excessive use of force as if he has time to stop and think how hard he is allowed to hit the guy standing trying to take his head off in the street.
You've answered your own question there, the guy was standing in the street.. He is a bouncer/doorman NOT the police, he has no right to restrain/touch people in the street, he is there to protect the private property he has been paid to protect.
P.S. I'm not saying the guy didn't deserve it
I didn't ask a question let alone answer it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bf47/8bf476d5bb1f768262e8393cb908adb93dd8383c" alt=""
At the point the guy becomes physically aggressive towards the bouncer, the fact the guy is a bouncer becomes a side-note. He has every right to defend himself as a person, not a doorman.
But he didn't become physically aggressive.
The bouncer kicked him, then he became aggressive.
|