mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
if it turned out to be camera trickery then he is of will_doyle
|
willay
Moderator
Organiser: South East, National Events
Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
I think Cosmo is full of shit as usual tbh
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by mwg
if it turned out to be camera trickery then he is of will_doyle
And he'd never work in TV again, never get his big sellout shows around the country/world.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by willay
I think Cosmo is full of shit as usual tbh
I bet you cant prove it though...
|
willay
Moderator
Organiser: South East, National Events
Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
quote:
Originally posted by willay
I think Cosmo is full of shit as usual tbh
I bet you cant prove it though...
I can prove it by searching for posts by the user Cosmo.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
He needs to do it again but next time show the balls before the lottery draw
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by willay
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
quote:
Originally posted by willay
I think Cosmo is full of shit as usual tbh
I bet you cant prove it though...
I can prove it by searching for posts by the user Cosmo.
That could just be camera trickery though.
|
willay
Moderator
Organiser: South East, National Events
Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
quote:
Originally posted by willay
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
quote:
Originally posted by willay
I think Cosmo is full of shit as usual tbh
I bet you cant prove it though...
I can prove it by searching for posts by the user Cosmo.
That could just be camera trickery though.
but it isnt, its just plain old Craig is bored sitting at home with no mates so posts shit on the Internet.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by willay
but it isnt, its just plain old Craig is bored sitting at home with no mates so posts shit on the Internet.
But how can you guarantee this like Paul can?
|
Whittie
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 06
Location: North Wales Drives: BMW, Corsa & Fiat
User status: Offline
|
Bit personal in here 
On a serious note, however he did it, it was a good effort.
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72F_0wOtFLQ
why does the camera stay perfectly still between 8secs and 13secs yet throughout the whole thing its moving all the time?
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
So all the apparent years worth of research and planning was for 10 minutes worth of camera trickery....
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Gareth F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72F_0wOtFLQ
why does the camera stay perfectly still between 8secs and 13secs yet throughout the whole thing its moving all the time?
The camera guy was scratching his nut sack?
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
Who gives a fuck!
I really really wanna know 
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
With both hands 
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by mwg
if it turned out to be camera trickery then he is of will_doyle
Thing is
HE WILL NOT ADMIT IT'S CAMERA TRICKERY
The real trick will be on Friday, when he convinces us / brainwashes us to believe the way he 'did it'.
So on Friday I expect a whole load of you to go 'haha, fools thinking it was camera trickery' - but that's still most likely how he did it.
|
Lawrah
Premium Member
Registered: 25th Dec 04
User status: Offline
|
oh shut up.
|
Tommy L
Member
Registered: 21st Aug 06
Location: Northampton Drives: Audi wagon
User status: Offline
|
But Paul, how can you possibly say that? Have you got any proof that he will brain wash us and not admit it's camera trickery?
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Finally someone who speaks sense in the media...
The Times:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article6828450.ece
quote:
The thing we must expect of Brown, genius though he is, is that he will lie to us. Last night he claimed that an earlier meeting with Camelot, the lottery organiser, had established that the BBC had exclusive rights to announce the winning numbers first. This meant he could not show us the numbers on his ping-pong balls before the draw was made. But that, surely, was nonsense. It cannot be illegal to announce your prediction. He just didn’t want us to see them.
In contrast to the BBC razzmatazz fronted by a grinning Beatle called O. J. Borg, dark-suited Brown presented from a deserted studio staffed only by two cameramen, one of whom kept the plinth with the balls in frame throughout. So, how did the numbers get to the balls? Tiny radio-controlled projectors inside each of them? Your guess is as good as mine. What we needn’t believe was that Brown was nervous, that the trick was the culmination of a year’s planning and that identifying five out of six would have done him fine. Nor need we think that he can predict lotteries. If he could, he would be the next boss of Channel 4. They need the cash more than they need must-see TV.
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
I just think its funny that some people are like 'even if he gives the best possible explanation ever and it makes sence it will STILL BE CAMERA TRICKERY because I know best'
|
Lawrah
Premium Member
Registered: 25th Dec 04
User status: Offline
|
Oh for god sake.. Hes an Illusionist, its a bit of fun, stop trying to rumble everything he does and get over it.
|
willay
Moderator
Organiser: South East, National Events
Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
working it out is the best bit
|
Tommy L
Member
Registered: 21st Aug 06
Location: Northampton Drives: Audi wagon
User status: Offline
|
Its got everyone talking about it. That's the aim of these sort of programs. Now everyone will tune in on Friday and watch it. Ch4 win.
and as said its a bit of fun
[Edited on 10-09-2009 by corsa_tomtom]
|
Lawrah
Premium Member
Registered: 25th Dec 04
User status: Offline
|
I agree, but trying to squish every inch of fun and suprise out it is pathetic. I enjoy wondering how he did it and my crazy wee ideas  I dont care if he tells me a lie.. He could be god for all I care, I enjoy it. I wish I hadnt sold his tickets to go see Britney. The end.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
Finally someone who speaks sense in the media...
The Times:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article6828450.ece
quote:
The thing we must expect of Brown, genius though he is, is that he will lie to us. Last night he claimed that an earlier meeting with Camelot, the lottery organiser, had established that the BBC had exclusive rights to announce the winning numbers first. This meant he could not show us the numbers on his ping-pong balls before the draw was made. But that, surely, was nonsense. It cannot be illegal to announce your prediction. He just didn’t want us to see them.
In contrast to the BBC razzmatazz fronted by a grinning Beatle called O. J. Borg, dark-suited Brown presented from a deserted studio staffed only by two cameramen, one of whom kept the plinth with the balls in frame throughout. So, how did the numbers get to the balls? Tiny radio-controlled projectors inside each of them? Your guess is as good as mine. What we needn’t believe was that Brown was nervous, that the trick was the culmination of a year’s planning and that identifying five out of six would have done him fine. Nor need we think that he can predict lotteries. If he could, he would be the next boss of Channel 4. They need the cash more than they need must-see TV.
You're right he does have sense, as not once does he mention it could be a camera trick.
|
