RobHardyUK
Member
Registered: 11th May 03
Location: High Wycombe
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by chewbaccaman
quote: Originally posted by DanielJ
Mclaren is more aerodynamic tho
might be and £240,000 more to buy
the mclaren was 634k
nova is 2.83 to 60, and isnt it 10 on the quarter? mclaren is 11. pretty embarrasing. i would be very proud if i did that
|
Marc D
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
martin hadlands cossie is faster than the mclaren
|
RobHardyUK
Member
Registered: 11th May 03
Location: High Wycombe
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Marc D
martin hadlands cossie is faster than the mclaren
|
DanielJ
Member
Registered: 21st Nov 01
Location: gwent, south wales
User status: Offline
|
the nova was 11+ othaway around m8, still no1 has mentiond slatin sumos skyline
|
RobHardyUK
Member
Registered: 11th May 03
Location: High Wycombe
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by DanielJ
the nova was 11+ othaway around m8, still no1 has mentiond slatin sumos skyline
i have a vid of it doing a low ten
|
SteveW
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 02
Location: Up in the clouds
User status: Offline
|
The Sumo skyline, is 1000bhp at the flywheel. At the wheels its something like 740-780 i think. Mate read it in a jap magazine hes got...
|
blobs_cs_king
Member
Registered: 15th Aug 03
Location: Ure MUM
User status: Offline
|
I reacon the nova could beat that SKYLINE...
Taking the weight into comparrison and if the skyline has 740-780 @ the wheels and the nova is running 680 bhp @ the wheels...with the nova being MUCH smaller and lighter
I reacon it would be Close but NOVA would win
|
DanielJ
Member
Registered: 21st Nov 01
Location: gwent, south wales
User status: Offline
|
dont b silly, the skyline wud piss the nova, i aint seen that the nova is 680 @ the wheels yet either
|