John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
If the boat can be repaired at all, surely you could do it much quicker than the 12 years.
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by John
If the boat can be repaired at all, surely you could do it much quicker than the 12 years.
You're not taking into account how stoned you'd be mate
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
I said B cos the dogs would be no good and I'm not interested in weed. I could make myself a shelter and spears etc. to defend myself and hunt animals. And the bird for obvious reasons. Plus she could do the cooking and cleaning.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
In all seriousness, I'd rather be stuck with a dog than a bird, you wouldn't want to kill the dog after the first half an hour.
|
N3CRO
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
|
I can't decide between A and B
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
You would actually choose to stay on an island with a bird for another 8 years?
Once you'd pumped her on the first day you would be sick of her moaning.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
Got be better than shagging 2 male rottweilers for 12 years
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
C for the dogs and weed. I wouldn't ever leave.
Also I'm not at all scared of vicious animals. I'm top of the food chain they will be afraid of me
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
A, you could get the lesbians drunk and watch and/or join in.
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by adiohead
A, you could get the lesbians drunk and watch and/or join in.
You have a gun mate, you can do what you want to them
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
I'm surprised at all the C answers, tbh.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by adiohead
I'm surprised at all the C answers, tbh.
Lots of people in to beastiality
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
A for sure.
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
It's because the novelty of fucking the birds would soon ware of with their constant moaning about the shelters to cold, no shampoo etc
[Edited on 27-10-2011 by Baskey]
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Head says C, but B sounds pretty sweet. I reckon A could back fire and you're left to wank!
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Baskey
It's because the novelty of fucking the birds would soon ware of with their constant moaning about the shelters to cold, no shampoo etc
Since when has the novelty of sex ever worn off? 
One of the women will catch your food! The other will die so there will be less bitching and you can get drunk!
Then when you get home you're rich!
|
Jamie-C
Member
Registered: 3rd Jun 08
Location: Ballycastle
User status: Offline
|
Infact, I might just choose A instead and blow my brains out.
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
After a few months their gash/legs/pits would be so hairy you may as well fuck the rottie
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
you could pull the hair out with your teeth if it bothers you.
quote: Originally posted by mwg
quote: Originally posted by adiohead
I'm surprised at all the C answers, tbh.
Lots of people in to beastiality
think you're right m8
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by mwg
Got be better than shagging 2 male rottweilers for 12 years
Got to love the assumption because you have 2 dogs you would have to shag them 
Have a wank like every other guy that can't be arsed shagging their bird.
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by mwg
I said B cos the dogs would be no good and I'm not interested in weed. I could make myself a shelter and spears etc. to defend myself and hunt animals. And the bird for obvious reasons. Plus she could do the cooking and cleaning.
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
C of course
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Hammer
quote: Originally posted by mwg
Got be better than shagging 2 male rottweilers for 12 years
Got to love the assumption because you have 2 dogs you would have to shag them 
Have a wank like every other guy that can't be arsed shagging their bird.
I don't want to start taking this too seriously (even though I am a bit ) but what practical use would 2 dogs have? A woman would be more useful on a day to day basis.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Dogs could help you find food, keep you company, keep you warm.
A woman could do none of that.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
Scottish women must be even more weird than English women then
|