BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
ffs we been argueing about this so much Derrens back on again
|
Carl
Member
Registered: 9th May 04
Location: Jimmy Bennett's la la land.
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by BabyBlade
makes you wonder why in poker, you are rewarded a straight ?
why not 2,4,6,8,10 ?
Thats the rules of poker thats why, it would still work if you changed it from a straight to your combo, just you wouldn't have anyone to play against.
|
DannyB
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Feb 08
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by BabyBlade
ffs we been argueing about this so much Derrens back on again
Just had to turn it off, it's on in the background and I'm not sitting through that shite again.
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Carl
quote: Originally posted by BabyBlade
makes you wonder why in poker, you are rewarded a straight ?
why not 2,4,6,8,10 ?
Thats the rules of poker thats why, it would still work if you changed it from a straight to your combo, just you wouldn't have anyone to play against.
I believe that games called I win
My best mates quite good at it..
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
So how many stupid people we got left in this thread?
|
Danny P
Member
Registered: 20th Nov 02
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
Basically Babyblade you are saying that 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is less likly to come out than any other combination, which is wrong.
What I think you mean is, that 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is less likely to come out than any other random combination of numers, and by that I mean any of the 1000's of possible combinations
If you have 1 draw, then you have 1 chance of it being 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. However, you have 1000's of chances of it being a random combination of numbers.
However, the chances of it being any one of those 1000's is equal to the chance of it being 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
I think that makes sense
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
So how many stupid people we got left in this thread?
well your back.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by BabyBlade
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
So how many stupid people we got left in this thread?
well your back.
So thats +1 to the brainy crew.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Oh, and even if your maths was correct (its not), Id of only taken it seriously if you knew the difference between your and you're.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Lottowned
|
Danny P
Member
Registered: 20th Nov 02
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Nath
Lottowned
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Danny P
quote: Originally posted by Nath
Lottowned
FPMSL, I hope someone who knows Derren Brown sends that to him
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
Oh, and even if your maths was correct (its not), Id of only taken it seriously if you knew the difference between your and you're.
does it matter?
have you found me the results to prove your right ?
At the end of the day its the results that count, not your ability to punctuate correctly late at night, or what the mathematicians say..
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
coops@derrenbrown.co.uk
That is the email address for 'general enquiries' on his website. I suggest everyone sends an email just saying 'lottowned'
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
So how many stupid people we got left in this thread?
Surely this should read..
So how many stupid people have we got left in this thread?
Fail.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by BabyBlade
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
Oh, and even if your maths was correct (its not), Id of only taken it seriously if you knew the difference between your and you're.
does it matter?
have you found me the results to prove your right ?
At the end of the day its the results that count, not your ability to punctuate correctly late at night, or what the mathematicians say..
Yes it matters, its basic english, YOUR native language.
And I dont need to find you the results, there are a possible 14m results and not all of them have happened (that means a lot more non-sequential results havent happened than sequential), instead Ive shown you the maths behind it and that should be enough for anyone with half a brain.
Anyway, going by your own theory in YOUR quoted post, I win as more non-sequential wins have not come out then sequential.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by BabyBlade
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
So how many stupid people we got left in this thread?
Surely this should read..
So how many stupid people have we got left in this thread?
Fail.
Your right
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Nath
Fucking A+
|
DannyB
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Feb 08
User status: Offline
|
Someone please spam his twitter with that
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Babyblade - a group of 24 of us have got together and found the average of our decision on if you're correct or not.
You're incorrect.
Do you believe us now?
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Ive just emailed that pic to his email address i posted.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Cosmo
|
Skylined
Member
Registered: 27th Sep 05
Location: Sideways, Surrey
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Danny P
Basically Babyblade you are saying that 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is less likly to come out than any other combination, which is wrong.
What I think you mean is, that 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is less likely to come out than any other random combination of numers, and by that I mean any of the 1000's of possible combinations
If you have 1 draw, then you have 1 chance of it being 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. However, you have 1000's of chances of it being a random combination of numbers.
However, the chances of it being any one of those 1000's is equal to the chance of it being 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
I think that makes sense
correctamundo
there are only 43 combinations of consecutive numbers 1-6, 2-7 ...44-49
where as there are 6^49 = 1.34713546 × 10^38 possibilities of any random numbers
edit: grammar
[Edited on 11-09-2009 by Skylined]
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
Yes it matters, its basic english, YOUR native language.
well then you should probably change your location from "Im the real one!"
Last time I checked it's "I'm".
|