corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » 1.6 corsa vs civic type R


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author 1.6 corsa vs civic type R
mwg
Member

Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 08:54   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I think his Corsa is stripped out
SetH
Member

Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Online
23rd Jun 06 at 08:56   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Ah I see, couldnt be arsed to look through the garage.

Moral of this story is power to weight ratio owns. small BHP increases on very light cars using minor mods can make a worthwhile difference imo.
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:00   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Im yet to see a standard 106GTi RR'd at anything less than 130bhp
K2 GTi
Member

Registered: 21st Oct 04
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

my dash doesn't rattle
M16KE B
Member

Registered: 24th Feb 04
Location: Stirling
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by K2 HOY
my dash doesn't rattle


my girlfriends doesnt either. actually feels a pretty solid car imo
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE

Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by SetH

Moral of this story is power to weight ratio owns. small BHP increases on very light cars using minor mods can make a worthwhile difference imo.




ctr = 197 bhp and 1204kg = 166 bhp per tonne

106 = 120 bhp and 900kg = 135 bhp per tonne

mine = 170 bhp and 900kg = 192 bhp per tonne
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:28   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by muppetsport
im yet to see a 106gti that has a dashboard that doesnt rattle and try to escape onto the drivers knee


This hasnt happened on any of the GTi's ive had... however all have suffered from seal noise at 80+
Ditch
Member

Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

performing seal noises???
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by muppetsport
do they suffer windscreen wiper escapism syndrome at 110+ like a corsa does? my wipers are gonna fly off one day


yeah my first ones wipers used to creep up above 100 lol
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:33   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

iv got them wipers with the spoilers on, adds BHP
Ditch
Member

Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 09:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by muppetsport
do they suffer windscreen wiper escapism syndrome at 110+ like a corsa does? my wipers are gonna fly off one day


One of my wipers went flying up on my old Astra GTE 16v...

was doing about 130 leptons an hour, when it lifted up and wrapped itself around the wingmirror

good old vauxhall!!
Carl
Member

Registered: 9th May 04
Location: Jimmy Bennett's la la land.
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 10:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Dave A
ok then.

ctr = 197 bhp and 1204kg = 166 bhp per tonne

106 = 120 bhp and 900kg = 135 bhp per tonne

mine = 170 bhp and 900kg = 192 bhp per tonne


but then the 106 has no torque compared to the ctr anyway so its a pointless way of working it out


You were one mentioned that how can a 106 134bhp keep up with a 200bhp CTR. using the above is a bit more accurate and shows why it hasn't got the gap you perceived.
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 10:33   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

its more like 130-140bhp and 900kg for the 106's
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 10:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by muppetsport
i like the way someone says the ctr has tourque. thats lies. they have none at all

I disagree with you, for a 2.0 16v car it has quite a bit... 140lb/ft + i believe
Carl
Member

Registered: 9th May 04
Location: Jimmy Bennett's la la land.
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 10:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Sooty
its more like 130-140bhp and 900kg for the 106's


Yes but if he would have put that then the figures would have been even closer and his first statement would been even worse.

[Edited on 23-06-2006 by Carl]
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 10:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

lol aye

i just cant stand these people who spend £££ on corsa's and get kicks from people driving nice standard cars with interiors intact and dont sound like tractors
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 10:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by muppetsport
quote:
Originally posted by Sooty
quote:
Originally posted by muppetsport
i like the way someone says the ctr has tourque. thats lies. they have none at all

I disagree with you, for a 2.0 16v car it has quite a bit... 140lb/ft + i believe


so, 200bhp and 140lb/ft compared to an xe's 150bhp and 145'ish lb/ft

doesnt seem a great deal of tourque for a 200bhp 2liter 16v to me?????


147 lb-ft @5900 rpm

this is fine for a 2.0 car the extra power is produced via VVT of the VTEC giving the feel of no torque... it doesnt matter though, its still a reasonably quick car no matter what
SetH
Member

Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Online
23rd Jun 06 at 11:01   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Dave A
quote:
Originally posted by SetH

Moral of this story is power to weight ratio owns. small BHP increases on very light cars using minor mods can make a worthwhile difference imo.




why the rolling eyes? you dont agree that small bhp increases on a light car can make a worthwhile difference?

Take an elise for example, decent induction, decat and zorst makes a noticeable difference. Do the same to a 1200-1300kg vehicle and the difference is not really noticeable.


SetH
Member

Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Online
23rd Jun 06 at 11:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

agreed 147lb/ft for a 2.0 lump is about right. people compare it to the 200bhp figure and then scream its got no torque.

No point looking at the paper figures, anyone got a RR plot for a standard CTR?

Whats the torque spread like, im guessing it will be very peaky over a short rev range, making peak torque at 5900rpm isnt excatly great driveability for a road car. But like mentioned in other threds once your in the powerband i guess that becomes irrelevant, unless there is a hill of course.

[Edited on 23-06-2006 by SetH]
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE

Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 11:08   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Dave A
quote:
Originally posted by SetH

Moral of this story is power to weight ratio owns. small BHP increases on very light cars using minor mods can make a worthwhile difference imo.




why the rolling eyes? you dont agree that small bhp increases on a light car can make a worthwhile difference?

Take an elise for example, decent induction, decat and zorst makes a noticeable difference. Do the same to a 1200-1300kg vehicle and the difference is not really noticeable.





not sure why I put the

I totally agree with your statement.
SetH
Member

Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Online
23rd Jun 06 at 11:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Ah right ok, no worries fella
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE

Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 11:10   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

how does a 2 litre corsa compare to the 106 gti with minor mods
Sooty
Banned

Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 11:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Dave A
how does a 2 litre corsa compare to the 106 gti with minor mods


bout the same... ive seen a stardard 106gti run 15.0 and a few with just exhaust manifold and filter etc run 14's
Jason Iles
Member

Registered: 19th Jun 01
Location: Bristol
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 11:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

If I was driving the Type R Dave I would have beat you. Fact
Ditch
Member

Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
23rd Jun 06 at 11:14   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

15.2 @90mph in my GTE 16v... with crap 60ft time too!

so in a corsa shell the XE should be 14's all day long

  <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » 1.6 corsa vs civic type R 22 database queries in 0.0131309 seconds