Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Carrick was shite. As was Beckham.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
shit england performance
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
Carrick was shite. As was Beckham.
please tell e your joking? beckham was poor 1st half, never stopped running though, lampard and gerrard were our shittest players, and j. cole wasnt far behind
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
who really cares. you cant blame one person, its about working as a team, not individual merit.
|
abdus
Member
Registered: 23rd Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
system wasn't well in place thus some players not really performing to their usual level
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
lampard and gerrard have been poor the whole world cup compared to what there capable of, JC might as well of stopped off all the good he did. we have to play 4-4-2 next game for me, rooney had no support from lamps and sg.
|
abdus
Member
Registered: 23rd Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
lampard and gerrard have been poor the whole world cup compared to what there capable of, JC might as well of stopped off all the good he did. we have to play 4-4-2 next game for me, rooney had no support from lamps and sg.
lampard poor: yes
Gerrard poor: NO
gerrard had been playing out of position all the time...how could he perform?
|
Ry_B
Banned
Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
|
TBH does it really matter?
England have won 9 out of the last ten games and drawn the only one they didn't win..which they desereved to win it anyway.
Concentrate on the future not the past
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
so by that logic, your comment is irrelevant Ryan 
|
antonOO2
Member
Registered: 17th Sep 02
Location: Midlands
User status: Offline
|
i started posting about the world cup but i have given up as so much shoot has been posted.People are contradicting themselves all the time also.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
hopefully it was down to the heat the reason why englands performance was so shocking
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
i think that was quite a big part of the problem. Beckham was clearly effected by it
Robinson did well to waste a few mins to get the team some fluids though
and whoever is was who deflected the ball into the crossbar played very well
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
ashley cole
|
MarkM
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 01
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
Fat Frank was terrible again...
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by abdus
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
lampard and gerrard have been poor the whole world cup compared to what there capable of, JC might as well of stopped off all the good he did. we have to play 4-4-2 next game for me, rooney had no support from lamps and sg.
lampard poor: yes
Gerrard poor: NO
gerrard had been playing out of position all the time...how could he perform?
nigger please, you sound like cosmo. he was shit, had 0 efforts on target and wasted most his passes
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ry_B
TBH does it really matter?
England have won 9 out of the last ten games and drawn the only one they didn't win..which they desereved to win it anyway.
Concentrate on the future not the past
That's incorrect, they lost to Bellendarus.
Also, if your looking ahead instead of the past, then what does the last 10 games count for?
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by antonOO2
i started posting about the world cup but i have given up as so much shoot has been posted.People are contradicting themselves all the time also.
Just say what you see match by match, that's what I do. Boohoo if people don't like it, they don't have to share my opinion, they can voice their own I'm sure.
|
Ry_B
Banned
Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jizinho Silva 10
quote:
Originally posted by Ry_B
TBH does it really matter?
England have won 9 out of the last ten games and drawn the only one they didn't win..which they desereved to win it anyway.
Concentrate on the future not the past
That's incorrect, they lost to Bellendarus.
Also, if your looking ahead instead of the past, then what does the last 10 games count for?
Because I was showing that if you look at our track record overall they have won mostly which is what counts. Then saying "it doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning is winning" 
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
Winning is winning and if England stumble to a 1-0 win in the final against France for example then the World Cup would still be won, they will click in the next game I'm sure but I blame Sven for the poor performances, several players are taking different positions game after game, there is no time to settle in one slot, Hargreaves being an example of this.
[Edited on 25-06-2006 by Jizinho Silva 10]
|
Ry_B
Banned
Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
|
I don't rate Hargreaves, always thought he's over rated. Isn't he Canadian anyway? 
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
Canadian/German/English.
|
abdus
Member
Registered: 23rd Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
quote:
Originally posted by abdus
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
lampard and gerrard have been poor the whole world cup compared to what there capable of, JC might as well of stopped off all the good he did. we have to play 4-4-2 next game for me, rooney had no support from lamps and sg.
lampard poor: yes
Gerrard poor: NO
gerrard had been playing out of position all the time...how could he perform?
nigger please, you sound like cosmo. he was shit, had 0 efforts on target and wasted most his passes
is this directed to me?
if yes, let me know.....
AND YES, GERRARD WAS NOT POOR
[Edited on 25-06-2006 by abdus]
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
Sounds like this afternoons 150 mile blat on near empty roads was a good idea then? 
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
Carrick was shite. As was Beckham.
please tell e your joking? beckham was poor 1st half, never stopped running though, lampard and gerrard were our shittest players, and j. cole wasnt far behind
Never stopped running? Never did fuck all IMO and most others considering all the interviews and guys I watched it with. He scored a fucking grat free kick, but that is ALL he did all game.
Lampard wasnt great, and neither was Gerrard. But once again both of them were out of position. Lampard was toofar forward with Gerrard in first half, and Gerrard was practically upfront the second.
Still, we won and thats what matters IMO.
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
What is it with all this 'weather is too hot' shit?
In most (read all) big time sports the athletes train at altitude and in heat...now we have sven yapping on about being 'prepared' in the last 5 days for the conditions.
Lets just hope its raining next sat then
|
