big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
Get your flame suit on Gareth
|
Gareth
Member
Registered: 2nd Mar 00
Location: Derby, Drives: EVO VIII MR & pug 308
User status: Offline
|
Well you know big eck evos have razor sharpe handling! So m3s must be someting else if better
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Nath
quote: Originally posted by john-d
Nath we are talking mk4 r33..
Eck has mk5.
I know. I stated this im sure? Said i didnt know about mk5s bit my 1.8t was as fast as a mk4 but a lot slower than an m3
|
sand-eel
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 07
Location: carluke/braidwood--IRNBRULAND
User status: Offline
|
Have you's ever seen an evo turn in too quick? major understeer then it slows right down with the electronics slamming the neccesary brakes on to straighten it........don't know why there aren't any e46 M3's maybe as the driver gets faster and has to "upgrade" their group the M3 won't be competitive against 600bhp turbo'd stuff. I do know of an e36 M3 that competes as I sold him my own design of aerodynamic undertray.
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
at people who think M3s are slow
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
This site is hitting new heights in this thread
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
Can we all agree that as an all round package for the price it has no equal?
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
Think I'd rather have an RS4.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
Big price difference though?
im thinking an E46 M3 might suit my more mature years. the two car thing also pisses me off as well, just renewed tax on Passat and got scooby coming up as well.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
Yeah expensive still. The way they look and the noise they make though...
|
Eddx14xe
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 10
Location: Hertfordshire
User status: Offline
|
Still stand by my 330D comment
|
James
Member
Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: Surrey
User status: Offline
|
Are people seriously using how a car handles in snow as a comparison point? Incredible.
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
RS4's are an awesome price of kit. See a grey one on my way to work, so muscular
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Eddx14xe
Still stand by my 330D comment
What was that?
I hope your not going to compare a diesel to an ///M car?!
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
Not that many RS4s about really so they will probably continue to hold their price.
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Jambo
quote: Originally posted by Eddx14xe
Still stand by my 330D comment
What was that?
I hope your not going to compare a diesel to an ///M car?!
quote: Originally posted by Eddx14xe
0-60 in 5.5 seconds doesnt sound that fast, when 330D's do it in like 5.9seconds
comparing diesel to ///M
bit like comparing an R32
[Edited on 11-07-2011 by adiohead]
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by mwg
Not that many RS4s about really so they will probably continue to hold their price.
http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/3/3414/2001/33533500003_large.jpg
So
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
considering the thread is about speed then i think comparing a similar BMW which is less then .5 of a second is quite a good comparison?
|
R Lee
Member
Registered: 15th Aug 03
User status: Offline
|
Fuckity fuck
This thread is silly when an Evo comes in.
I've owned both of them. I've driven both of them quite hard too.
- M3 is fast. 0-60 in 5.5, 170+ delimited. Very comfortable and is capable. There is plenty of traction but, there is always the element of the back wheels wanting to slide out. Not that difficult to catch and bring back into line.
- Evo is nuts. Pure acceleration, monster handling, feels very safe. You can throw it into a corner and it'll swallow it up. Also feels very comfortable but, not as much quality materials used. 0-60 under 4, 160+.
If you're going on about how fast around the track, for a pure amateur, I can imagine the Evo to wins hands down. It genuinely makes you feel invincible. I think the M3 would be a bit too scary on the limits.
As for the R32, XE's, TT's, Leon comments... M3 would sail past. Unless caught in the wrong gear and was playing catch up. Closest hot hatch was new shape Audi S3 to the M3.
|
big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by adiohead
quote: Originally posted by Jambo
quote: Originally posted by Eddx14xe
Still stand by my 330D comment
What was that?
I hope your not going to compare a diesel to an ///M car?!
quote: Originally posted by Eddx14xe
0-60 in 5.5 seconds doesnt sound that fast, when 330D's do it in like 5.9seconds
comparing diesel to ///M
bit like comparing an R32
[Edited on 11-07-2011 by adiohead]
Whats your problem you tit
I have my opinion and just because it doesnt fall in line with yours or others in this thread then its all laughable.
Grow the fuck up and just accept that not everyone will agree
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
oooOOoooooooooooooooooooo
Need to take some of your own advice
"I have my opinion and just because it doesnt fall in line with yours or others in this thread then its all laughable."
I find it laughable, you don't
quote: Originally posted by R Lee
As for the R32, XE's, TT's, Leon comments... M3 would sail past.
Exactly! This happened to me
[Edited on 11-07-2011 by adiohead]
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
As I said pub figures and motorway overtaking is what deems a car better on here.
Comparing a low revving turbocharged diesel rep mobile to an ///M car is daft. They are for different purposes and driving experiences/styles. If you can't understand past 0-60 times then I pity you tbh.
|
big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
What a car can do on paper and what someone can do with it out on the road are 2 very different things and I for one have had a bit of sport with my mates old M3 on numerous occasions and there not that impressive. Against my old evo he didnt stand a chance in any situation, standing start, rolling start, twisty stuff etc. Top speed wise his was limited but mine got there a hell of a lot quicker than his did.
Now for the R32 which is causing a bit of a hassle. I never said it was quicker than an M3 but what I will say is that it doesnt race away from them as fast as your all making out.
I hope this has made it all a bit easier for you all to understand.
|
R Lee
Member
Registered: 15th Aug 03
User status: Offline
|
Pretty much any car that's 3.0l upwards will be decent enough when playing with an M3. 350z, other BM's etc.
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
I'm unable to take this thread seriously because people keep using those silly slashes before the name of the car.
|