corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Snap Day » interesting question from a photography forum


New Topic

New Poll
  Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author interesting question from a photography forum
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
7th Mar 06 at 13:33   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I have been asked to shoot some adult interest photosets which is a completely new field for me. Would the 1D mk2 be suitable for this or would a 5D be better. I think i like the 1D as it is weatherproof and as i may well be in the line of fire sometimes, this may stop any fluid getting in my camera . I'm also drawn to the higher resolution 5D, and it's lighter weight could mean i could hold it with one hand which i prefer. At the moment i have a 20D but it's getting old and i'm worried it's noise will put the performers off their stroke. Does anyone shoot this kind of material with either of these cameras, a friend of mine has recomended the faster frame rate of the 1D mk2n to capture the all important money and thinks the 5D will be too slow.
Edd
Member

Registered: 8th Nov 04
Location: Glasgow
User status: Offline
7th Mar 06 at 13:40   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

watersports?
Balling
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
7th Mar 06 at 14:36   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
it's lighter weight could mean i could hold it with one hand which i prefer.

Suspicios...



 
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Snap Day » interesting question from a photography forum 25 database queries in 0.0108068 seconds