Jake
Member
Registered: 24th Jan 05
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
He couldve fucked a kid on stage and the fans would still love him.
albeit a different genre of fan..
|
lostboy
Banned
Registered: 29th Jan 09
Location: Durham
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
I bet if he did get found guilty and went to prison, the fans would say he was framed.
Wasn't he sent to prison in the early 90's for something similar?
|
N3CRO
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
I bet if he did get found guilty and went to prison, the fans would say he was framed.
Wasn't he sent to prison in the early 90's for something similar?
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I know he paid off some family coz he 'supposedly' abused their son.
|
lostboy
Banned
Registered: 29th Jan 09
Location: Durham
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
I bet if he did get found guilty and went to prison, the fans would say he was framed.
Wasn't he sent to prison in the early 90's for something similar?
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I know he paid off some family coz he 'supposedly' abused their son.
No supposedly about it, why would you give some fucker millions of dollars if they were telling lies? Although the family obviously cared more about money than their child if they accepted it (which they did as we know)
The guy was a pedo, no ifs no buts, he was a pedo and only got off with it because he paid his victims off. He was caught in bed with more than one child at his neverland ranch or what ever it was called, he claimed he was just trying to cheer them up, most probably with his magic wand and box of tricks.
|
Ben D
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 05
Location: South West
User status: Offline
|
I wouldn't bet against macauley Culkin Exposing him as a peado and removing any doubt in about 15 years when he's bankrupt and needs to sell a story and needs some exposure
|
N3CRO
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
I bet if he did get found guilty and went to prison, the fans would say he was framed.
Wasn't he sent to prison in the early 90's for something similar?
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I know he paid off some family coz he 'supposedly' abused their son.
No supposedly about it, why would you give some fucker millions of dollars if they were telling lies?
Agreed, but like you said, its weird they accepted the monies.
Anyways, I put supposedly coz it was never proven.
I do and will always believe it did the things he was accused of but maybe we'll never know the truth.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Benji D
I wouldn't bet against macauley Culkin Exposing him as a peado and removing any doubt in about 15 years when he's bankrupt and needs to sell a story and needs some exposure
He's still worth 15m and is going out with the chick who plays Meg in Family Guy. He wont be broke.
|
Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
I think we should take a moment to remember all those people he touched.
|
Shell
Premium Member
Registered: 14th Oct 08
User status: Offline
|
I think people are idiots to believe everything they read in the papers or hear on t.v. I honestly believe he was incredibly messed up and had no clue about social boundaries with kids. It's more than likely he did share a bed with them etc, incredibly innapropriate. However, if someone had abused my son, I'd want them jailed. I wouldn't accept a pay off. And i think any self respecting person would say the same. However, there are a lot of arseholes in the world, and it seems to me that money was all they were ever out to get, and probably knew they'd make millions even through all the stories they sold. To drag your child through public hell like that then accept a pay off, looks to me like they lied to gain wealth, not justice for the abused.
Anyway, didn't that boy admit he'd lied?
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
I bet if he did get found guilty and went to prison, the fans would say he was framed.
Wasn't he sent to prison in the early 90's for something similar?
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I know he paid off some family coz he 'supposedly' abused their son.
No supposedly about it, why would you give some fucker millions of dollars if they were telling lies? Although the family obviously cared more about money than their child if they accepted it (which they did as we know)
The guy was a pedo, no ifs no buts, he was a pedo and only got off with it because he paid his victims off. He was caught in bed with more than one child at his neverland ranch or what ever it was called, he claimed he was just trying to cheer them up, most probably with his magic wand and box of tricks.
if you had hundreds of millions and were having a successful singing career, yes you would pay someone off with a few million just to shut them up if it was having an affect on your career.
not saying he's not a paedophile, but at the end of the day, i want to see facts, not hear say.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Benji D
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
You are probably a child botherer tbh.
 erm... Random insults, funny... 
Yes a random accusation you newbie n00b and I have no evidence that you are a pedophile.
Where is your evidence for Jackson???
Oh wait.... he had an extensive trial and was acquitted on all charges but you would know best and have made your conclusion hey 
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ben G
not saying he's not a paedophile, but at the end of the day, i want to see facts, not hear say.
Maybe you should have watched the trial?
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
He was a dirty fucked up paedophile that happened to make some cracking music. The End.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
Yes CS knows best etc etc
Interesting comment that the fans would have stuck by him and claimed that he was framed if he had been convicted. Personally I think he would have lost a lot of fans.
What is even more interesting is the fact that he was proved innocent by a Jury after what was a mammoth Trial. Yet all the "non fans" have convinced themselves and made their own conclusions that he is a Pedophile.
Which group of people are the Mongs in this instance?
[Edited on 26-06-2010 by SetH]
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
The fans obviously.
|
sc0ott
Member
Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ben G
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
quote:
Originally posted by lostboy
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
I bet if he did get found guilty and went to prison, the fans would say he was framed.
Wasn't he sent to prison in the early 90's for something similar?
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I know he paid off some family coz he 'supposedly' abused their son.
No supposedly about it, why would you give some fucker millions of dollars if they were telling lies? Although the family obviously cared more about money than their child if they accepted it (which they did as we know)
The guy was a pedo, no ifs no buts, he was a pedo and only got off with it because he paid his victims off. He was caught in bed with more than one child at his neverland ranch or what ever it was called, he claimed he was just trying to cheer them up, most probably with his magic wand and box of tricks.
if you had hundreds of millions and were having a successful singing career, yes you would pay someone off with a few million just to shut them up if it was having an affect on your career.
not saying he's not a paedophile, but at the end of the day, i want to see facts, not hear say.
actually,
http://www.makli.com/jordan-chandler-admits-he-lied-about-michael-jackson-003762/
i remember that being in the sun newspaper a while ago. this was the reason mj started taking all those tablets. all because the parents wanted money. sad fucks.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by mwg
The fans obviously.
/me shuts the door
[Edited on 26-06-2010 by SetH]
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Ben G
not saying he's not a paedophile, but at the end of the day, i want to see facts, not hear say.
Maybe you should have watched the trial?
was it televised then? 
|
N3CRO
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
What is even more interesting is the fact that he was proved innocent by a Jury after what was a mammoth Trial. Yet all the "non fans" have convinced themselves and made their own conclusions that he is a Pedophile.
[Edited on 26-06-2010 by SetH]
Just coz he was proven innocent, doesn't mean he actually was innocent.
Just like innocent ppls go to jail, the guity occasionally get away with it.
|
