corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Golf mk4 gti


New Topic

New Poll
  Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Golf mk4 gti
Bonney
Member

Registered: 14th Nov 04
Location: St Helens
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Just wandering if all the 1.8 mk4 gti were turbos?

Or did they do some n/a onees aswell?
tom_simes
Show Staff
Organiser: South Wales
Premium Member


Avatar

Registered: 12th Jan 05
Location: Undy, Newport Drives: Skoda Octavia vRS estate
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:20   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

They did some 2.0 N/A ones, but avoid them like the plague!
Jon_C
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Dec 05
Location: Suffolk
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:20   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I have an 1800 20v non turbo gti 125bhp one
Jon_C
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Dec 05
Location: Suffolk
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:21   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

2.0 are regarded as worse than the 1.8s i believe
SXi_Tim
Member

Registered: 11th Mar 03
Location: South Yorkshire Drives: RS3, LET B
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

2.0s are awful, the 1.8 20v n/a is ok but get the turbo
Bonney
Member

Registered: 14th Nov 04
Location: St Helens
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Just looking at one, Its a 1.8 taking that they did some n/a models aswell as the turbo

Wouldn't want the 2.0, Heared they are slow and thirsty!

Idealy after a turbo but seen a 1.8 local to me which looks in decent condition!

[Edited on 07-12-2010 by Bonney]
SXi_Tim
Member

Registered: 11th Mar 03
Location: South Yorkshire Drives: RS3, LET B
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yeah 1.8 n/a were the earlier models
Bonney
Member

Registered: 14th Nov 04
Location: St Helens
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Its on a T plate, So i'm assuming it is!

Think i'll have a look when i finish work, See what its like. Pictures can make a dog look good!

THIS is the one in question. Seems tidy, Mileage doesn't bother me!

[Edited on 07-12-2010 by Bonney]
Norcy91
Member

Registered: 15th Sep 08
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Think thats a non-turbo seen as it says insurance group 8
SXi_Tim
Member

Registered: 11th Mar 03
Location: South Yorkshire Drives: RS3, LET B
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 22:44   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yeah will be on a T plate. What mileage?
t_benn_1
Member

Registered: 28th Sep 04
Location: Shropshire
User status: Offline
7th Dec 10 at 23:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

get a turbo mate
adiohead
Member

Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 00:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

they're all shit
Ingham
Banned

Registered: 9th May 08
Location: Burnley, Lancashire
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 00:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Golfs are for sCeNe boys with no penis and the ones of the asian pursuasion
antnee
Member

Registered: 30th Dec 07
Location: Cov Drives: Clio 197
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 00:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I didn't think the 1.8 N/A was even put in the MK4 Golf? According to Parkers it wasn't
Norcy91
Member

Registered: 15th Sep 08
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 00:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by antnee
I didn't think the 1.8 N/A was even put in the MK4 Golf? According to Parkers it wasn't


I've just looked at there's definitely 1.8 N/A listed on Parkers in the MK4. They're underneath the Anniversary one for some reason
SXi_Tim
Member

Registered: 11th Mar 03
Location: South Yorkshire Drives: RS3, LET B
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 01:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by antnee
I didn't think the 1.8 N/A was even put in the MK4 Golf? According to Parkers it wasn't


Yes there is According to parkers my vectra is 170bhp standard, which it isn't.
Fro
Member

Registered: 20th Jun 06
Location: Rainham, Essex Drives: A3 2.0TDi Sport
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 08:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

They definately did a non turbo 1.8 have seen quite a few.

Both the 1.8 and the 2.0 n/a are slower than a corsa sport iirc

[Edited on 08-12-2010 by fro-dizzle]
Teddy
Member

Registered: 19th Jul 04
Location: Northampton Drives: VW Bora 1.9TDi pd130
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 15:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yep they did.

1.8 20v - Non Turbo - 125bhp
2.0 8v - Non Turbo - 115bhp
1.8 20v Turbo (Like mine) - AGU Engine code 150bhp
1.8 20v Turbo - AUQ engine code 180bhp.
Ryan_G1
Member

Registered: 29th Aug 05
Location: East Ayrshire
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 16:33   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by fro-dizzle

Both the 1.8 and the 2.0 n/a are slower than a corsa sport iirc

[Edited on 08-12-2010 by fro-dizzle]


This is true
NovaGTE2
Member

Registered: 26th Sep 06
Location: Peasedown St John, Bristol Avon
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 19:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I have a T plate 1.8 20v T at the moment and is a really nice car to drive; pretty quick compaired to most things for the same money and getting 36MPG
taylorboosh
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 20:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Dont get a non turbo.... Get a 1.8t and a remap
antnee
Member

Registered: 30th Dec 07
Location: Cov Drives: Clio 197
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 21:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by fro-dizzle
They definately did a non turbo 1.8 have seen quite a few.

Both the 1.8 and the 2.0 n/a are slower than a corsa sport iirc



They would be, same/less power than a corsa and a few 100KG's heavier!
Gareth F
Member

Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
8th Dec 10 at 23:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

1.8 n/a and 2.0 n/a are slow as fuck and still drink the juice. My 1.6 corsa out done the 1.8 gti and 2.0 gti mk4 golfs.

Mk4 1.9 Gt Tdi 130 is where its at

130bhp 228lbs and still get 52mpg (ive had 69mpg over 44 miles) Then remap to 180bhp and 290lbs and they become more economical
tom-gardiner
Member

Registered: 10th Jul 09
Location: Weymouh, Dorset
User status: Offline
9th Dec 10 at 02:36   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

The GTI models were;

1.8 20v Turbo with 150bhp

and

2.0 8v with 115bhp

They also done a 1.8 20v non turbo. This produced 125bhp.

If you are looking to modify and increase performance on a mk4 golf the 1.8t is the way to go. if you are just looking for a car go for the 1.8 20v N/A this isnt much slower than the turbo model just 0.4sec more to 60mph and produces much better mpg due to not having the turbo. However a simple re-map from r-tech or revo till take the 1.8t up to around 200bhp dependant on engine code. AGU has a KO3 turbo, this is the most basic and ill produce around 190-200bhp with a remap. The later engines such as AUM ect have a KO3s turbo which when remaped can produce 210bhp.

 
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Golf mk4 gti 23 database queries in 0.0360491 seconds