mazdaspeed
Member
Registered: 8th Jan 05
Location: Darlington
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by brebaz
quote:
Originally posted by IvIarkgraham
hmmm fire that guts a house? insurance claim to cover legal costs????
I also think this!
The guy was a fireman too.
|
Sunz
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: SE England
User status: Offline
|
Straw walls are pretty good against fire, the blocks have no air in side so they don't burn.
|
willay
Moderator
Organiser: South East, National Events
Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
MYTH BUSTED!
|
FAZ
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Nov 07
Location: Coventry
User status: Offline
|
bullshit, a huge stack burnt down last year near my house in the sticks 
|
Dan295
Member
Registered: 9th Oct 06
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Phillips_91
quote:
Originally posted by jimmy 2.1
About time a claim like that went in favour of race track. Hopefully the amount of legal costs of losing a case like this puts off other people trying the same thing.
 This! sick of people whinging about motorsport ruining there lively hood/ homes, if you don't like it, FUCK OFF! theres plenty of countryside in england thats not near a racetrack!!
 typical view of cases like this, noise, traffic, litter, smell.
the venue wasnt in operation when they moved in
the straw bale construction was supposed to be built around the perimeter of the stadium to reflect noise but the owners of the stadium built it on the edge of their house to use less bales and make it cheaper.
the thing that broke the case was that they do have permission to use the venue as thats when the permission was granted in 1975. the minute one of their events or engines are started up after the stated planning permission will result in the couple taking action
|
