corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
Is there much difference in Lens quality between something like say, Tamron, Sigma, Canon..... If they offer a lens with similar properties to each other?
|
andy1868
Member
Registered: 22nd Jun 06
Location: Burscough, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
yes i'm pretty sure alot of people would say there is alot of difference i'm afraid, this is "normally" mirrored in the price. An expensive Sigma is likely to be better than a lower end Nikon/Canon for example. People tend to say the manufacturer's own lens are better quality than the 3rd party ones but there are plenty of exceptions to that rule.
I've found the best way is to research thoroughly each piece of kit you're wanting and make an informed decision from there.
Which lenses were you looking at?
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
I'm all over the place tbh! A lens which would drop down to f1.2 with a focal length of 15 - 400mm would be ideal 
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
and a decent mortgage advisor to help me fund it
|
andy1868
Member
Registered: 22nd Jun 06
Location: Burscough, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
might need a gym membership too, that would weigh a frigging tonne 
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
I've taken some great pictures with my Tamron 70-300, that cost 120, obviously there is better, but for the price its great.
As said, money talks
|
andy1868
Member
Registered: 22nd Jun 06
Location: Burscough, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
i probably should have put that in my answer too, just because something is cheaper doesn't make it a bad lens, just because there is a bigger badder brother doesn't therefore make it shite. Buy the best you can afford, skill goes further than expensive equipment. A bland photo taken with a £4000 camera is the same as a bland photo taken with a £300 camera.
Obviously you need more expensive gear if you need more expensive gear, you can't shoot a bird 150 yards away with am 18-55mm lens with all the will in the world
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
More thinking about stuff like Le Mans night shots which I WILL! get round to one day.
But the other night I was playing around taking pics of me and some mates (well, not of myself - that wouldve been tricky) playing badminton indoors. The lighting was poor, the action relatively fast and a kit lens at f4.5 at best. Alls I could manage was taking the ISO up high and getting plenty of noise on the image
|
Rob E
Member
Registered: 1st Jan 06
Location: Madeley, Stafford....I want to live back in Wales!
User status: Offline
|
I upgraded my kit lens to a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 non VC and its unbelievably sharp for the price. I think I paid about £350 new for it. They can be picked up used for around the £180 mark
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ is a brilliant site for comparing lenses for image quality etc
|
Balling
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Apr 04
Location: Denmark
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by corb
Is there much difference in Lens quality between something like say, Tamron, Sigma, Canon..... If they offer a lens with similar properties to each other?
No, not much at all.
Usually one has a slight advantage over the other and you'll need to read reviews to find out which.
There's a lot of brand snobbery in photography though, so be prepared to defend choosing a third party lens.
As said, third party lenses drop in resale value, so there's usually some good second hand deals to be made.
|
whitter45
Member
Registered: 15th Nov 02
Location: Norton
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Balling
quote:
Originally posted by corb
Is there much difference in Lens quality between something like say, Tamron, Sigma, Canon..... If they offer a lens with similar properties to each other?
No, not much at all.
Usually one has a slight advantage over the other and you'll need to read reviews to find out which.
There's a lot of brand snobbery in photography though, so be prepared to defend choosing a third party lens.
As said, third party lenses drop in resale value, so there's usually some good second hand deals to be made.
this
It will depend what lens you are looking at - i.e wide angle, zoom etc as each type has preferred makers
What I find is that the likes of Nikon and Canon are normally the best but the difference in price is sometimes hard to justify
People want to say they have such a lens and do not use it to the potential or often enough to warrant having it
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
The best thing to do is check the reviews of the lens you're looking at. With the Tameron zoom lens I've got, there are some very slight imperfections (I can't remember the correct term for what happens) right at the edge of the photos you take with it and the only reason I know they're there is because of a review comparing it with a Nikon equivalent. For me it didn't matter and in reality I don't notice it.
|
