corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Reporting a dangerous road layout


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Reporting a dangerous road layout
Toby
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 29th Nov 05
User status: Offline
25th Apr 15 at 06:41   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Ben G
quote:
Originally posted by Dee25790
Assuming this is 60mph road? If the limit is 60 then does that not mean that driving at 60 is NOT dangerous driving? Conditions permitting..?

Otherwise why bother making it a 60? Why not a 40?


In that case, your way of thinking would make it ok to do 60mph in snow and icy conditions.

Think about it........


it says conditions permitting. Which is correct.

I think it's a valid point, for a regular driver you with a cautionary approach as you are aware of the potential risk. An unsuspecting driver should do the same but reactions to a situation unprepared are always going to be slower.
Mike
Organiser: North West and North Wales
Premium Member


Avatar

Registered: 20th May 06
Location: nr. Skipton, North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 11:52   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Marc
Is there a sign saying crest of hill/right turn etc?


quote:
Originally posted by Steve
no


So have they removed this one?



And these ones?



And this one?



That seems an unusual move.

Also, is this the same road you were referring to a while back? The Hereford to Worcester road where there aren't many opportunities to overtake trucks? If so, surely you already knew about the junctions and should have been driving with that in mind, rather than having to rely on your apparently 'cat-like reactions' once you'd found yourself in shit street due to poor advanced planning?
Ben G
Member

Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

steve's just been owned good and proper. He'll probably go and ask his old Queen what he should reply with
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:13   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I was more referring to the fact that you expect the road to filter cars off safely if they need to turn, or terminate the overtaking lane before the junction, not even any slow markings in the road either as you can see.

If the road is dual carraigeway its reasonable to expect to be able to overtake without having a car suddenly appear on you stopped waiting to turn on a blind section, otherwise why is it even Dual Carriageway

In my opinion, the dual part should be terminated before and a hatched section marked off for the cars turning. Anyone with half a brain can see the dangers of this layout.

This isn't the usual road, I normally take the Ledbury road. But I have driven this road before.


[Edited on 26-04-2015 by Steve]
Welsh Dan
Member

Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

That's a single carriageway though, not a dual carriageway.
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:30   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

You know what I mean
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:33   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

So those signs above are still there?
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:39   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yes.

I don't care what any of you Google maps warriors say, it's fooking dangerous
Mike
Organiser: North West and North Wales
Premium Member


Avatar

Registered: 20th May 06
Location: nr. Skipton, North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:42   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

That's where you're reading the signs wrong, the signs don't just warn of a turn off, they also warn you about potential traffic joining the road. Someone turning out from those junctions will be even less obvious than a car stopped in your lane so I'd be thankful that you learned the lesson the easy way.

Terminating the overtaking lane part way up a hill would also bring in further risks and more potential for the congestion that it was designed to alleviate.

Finally, as Dan says, that isn't dual carriageway, dual carriageways refer to the number of carriageways, not the number of lanes.
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:45   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
Yes.

I don't care what any of you Google maps warriors say, it's fooking dangerous

Not winding you up etc etc, but what what you like to see added to the road? More/bigger signs, chevrons/red sections on the road?
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:49   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yes cars joining is another reason why it's dangerous, cars should be warned to slow specifically not encouraged to speed up by having overtaking lanes leading past it
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 12:57   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

You also have to bear in mind the psychology of the drivers. They will have been stuck behind something slow for potentially miles so they are going to be anxious to get past using every inch of overtaking lane if it's presented to them. It's all very well sitting in your armchair pointing out a junction sign but in reality most drivers mentality will be to get past the slow vehicle.
ShEp
Member

Registered: 9th Aug 05
Location: Dingwall, Highland
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 13:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yeah, but you said there was no signs or anything...?
Jason x
Premium Member

Registered: 19th Apr 13
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 13:06   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Trash can posts are not visible by users
Mike
Organiser: North West and North Wales
Premium Member


Avatar

Registered: 20th May 06
Location: nr. Skipton, North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 13:08   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

It's not about going slow, it's about being aware of what's coming up around the bend and making sure you have time and space to deal with it.

If you can't stop in the space that you can see to be clear then you're risking something like this or worse happening. Just because it has national speed limit signs and an overtaking lane, doesn't mean it's safe to do 60 mph along it's entire length when conditions are good, there's still likely to be bends etc. that require you to slow down. Should councils really waste money on paint because you can't be bothered to judge whether what you are doing is safe?

You may have a point, there may be something that could be done to make the junction safer but it's hard for me to see when what you describe doesn't match what I'm seeing.
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 13:39   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Something else to consider is you could be overtaking 2/3 hgvs up here and the junction signs could easily be obstructed from being seen at all
ShEp
Member

Registered: 9th Aug 05
Location: Dingwall, Highland
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 13:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by ShEp
Yeah, but you said there was NO signs or anything...?


Mike
Organiser: North West and North Wales
Premium Member


Avatar

Registered: 20th May 06
Location: nr. Skipton, North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 13:55   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

There's still a sign on the offside incase the nearside ones are obscured.
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 14:01   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Lorry coming the other way too
ShEp
Member

Registered: 9th Aug 05
Location: Dingwall, Highland
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 14:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Defeated, you were driving like a tit.
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 15:04   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Alright pal
Welly Wanger
Member

Registered: 5th Jan 12
Location: Cambodia stroke Yorkshire
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 16:01   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

God damn cat like reaction, could of been giving our condolences to the queen. Read the road pleb
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 16:39   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Who here wants to fight me about this?
ShEp
Member

Registered: 9th Aug 05
Location: Dingwall, Highland
User status: Offline
26th Apr 15 at 17:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Go for it


  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Reporting a dangerous road layout 23 database queries in 0.0162840 seconds