Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
why didnt honda ever do a rally car?
forgetting all the bullshit vtec talk for atleast 3 replies, they make some good std handling cars, some good engines, the cars perform really well and are well enough built compared to other manufacturers that did enter.
maybe rallying isnt as big of a thing in japan?
i just think the older shape civic vti (170 odd bhp thing) is a good overall car and would have been an interesting choice in the late 90's to rally. toyota did the corolla i suppose, buy nothing i can think of from honda?
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
The V-tec might warp the soft ground beneath it.
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
Good question.
I think it's probably because they concentrated their efforts on Saloon/GT/F1 formulas?
Never really thought about it.
|
whitter45
Member
Registered: 15th Nov 02
Location: Norton
User status: Offline
|
IMO its not the right marketing for the company
Honda have always been involved in motorsport and racing and yes rally is a from of motorsport but their sucess in F1, Indycar, GT etc has meant no need to venture into this category
Its like Subaru - Rally have established them in the car industry and yes prodrive do involve themselves in other motorpsort but Rally is their primary target
Just feel its a Marketing issue - Toyota have had a simialr issues hence F1 and the money it has invested into F1 as a in house devloped car like Renualt and Ferrari as oppose it racing tems such as Maclearn (sp)
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by whitter45
IMO its not the right marketing for the company
Honda have always been involved in motorsport and racing and yes rally is a from of motorsport but their sucess in F1, Indycar, GT etc has meant no need to venture into this category
Its like Subaru - Rally have established them in the car industry and yes prodrive do involve themselves in other motorpsort but Rally is their primary target
Just feel its a Marketing issue - Toyota have had a simialr issues hence F1 and the money it has invested into F1 as a in house devloped car like Renualt and Ferrari as oppose it racing tems such as Maclearn (sp)
yeah, see what your saying actually. i guess from a marketing point of view honda wouldnt benefit anything from the rally world as such unlike as you say subaru who without it would still be selling their cars in tractor and farm related business. i guess most of what we see these days made and developed by honda for their road cars engines and both suspension, they will take more from the f1 and touring car side of things, which to be fair has more of a benefit for the type of road cars they sell, as in the integra type r and the civic type-r. makes a lot of sense of how they developed such a high revving and well handling cars, as the power delivery, although we slate them, most other car makers must be envious of.
|
sleeper 5 door
Member
Registered: 12th Dec 06
User status: Offline
|
number 73
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by sleeper 5 door
number 73
what you mean paul?
|
whitter45
Member
Registered: 15th Nov 02
Location: Norton
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by muppetsport
quote: Originally posted by whitter45
IMO its not the right marketing for the company
Honda have always been involved in motorsport and racing and yes rally is a from of motorsport but their sucess in F1, Indycar, GT etc has meant no need to venture into this category
Its like Subaru - Rally have established them in the car industry and yes prodrive do involve themselves in other motorpsort but Rally is their primary target
Just feel its a Marketing issue - Toyota have had a simialr issues hence F1 and the money it has invested into F1 as a in house devloped car like Renualt and Ferrari as oppose it racing tems such as Maclearn (sp)
yeah, see what your saying actually. i guess from a marketing point of view honda wouldnt benefit anything from the rally world as such unlike as you say subaru who without it would still be selling their cars in tractor and farm related business. i guess most of what we see these days made and developed by honda for their road cars engines and both suspension, they will take more from the f1 and touring car side of things, which to be fair has more of a benefit for the type of road cars they sell, as in the integra type r and the civic type-r. makes a lot of sense of how they developed such a high revving and well handling cars, as the power delivery, although we slate them, most other car makers must be envious of.
thats exactly what I'm saying - on a slightly different note my mate has just got an M3 BMW with 343 BHP
Right the CTR was slated in previous threads as it makes 197 bhp with only 145 lb/ft for Torque (so called shite for a 2.0 engine)
right the M3 with 3.2 makes 343 BHP (high out put) but with 269 lb./ft of torque similar to the 3.2 v6 of the VAG group - for the torque figure
So is that torque figure shite as its the same as other 3.2's I think not
People talk rubbish about the Vtec units yet they set the standard as most car makers have follwed Vtec with VVt in toyota and VVt in the VAG engines etc
[Edited on 29-12-2006 by whitter45]
|
The Fonz
Member
Registered: 9th Dec 05
Location: cumbria
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by whitter45
thats exactly what I'm saying - on a slightly different note my mate has just got an M3 BMW with 343 BHP
Right the CTR was slated in previous threads as it makes 197 bhp with only 145 lb/ft for Torque (so called shite for a 2.0 engine)
right the M3 with 3.2 makes 343 BHP (high out put) but with 269 lb./ft of torque similar to the 3.2 v6 of the VAG group - for the torque figure
So is that torque figure shite as its the same as other 3.2's I think not
People talk rubbish about the Vtec units yet they set the standard as most car makers have follwed Vtec with VVt in toyota and VVt in the VAG engines etc
[Edited on 29-12-2006 by whitter45]
before the vtec slagging starts i'll just say, 145 lb ft shite? Whats a standard xe torque again? 160 lb ft or summet? not a huge difference but the power difference is 40-50 hp more from k20 to the xe. The honda engines are no better or worse than the xe's they just work in a different way, ( high reving power compared to low down torque). I think with the correct gearing a honda rally car would be good. Also will people stop saying vvt on toyota's and vag's is the same as v tec it's compleatly different!! drive all of them and you will see.
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
do any honda's have 4wd as standard ?
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
vtec is the same as VVTLI though
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Don't think so, other than CR-V/HR-V obviously. The lack of torque isn't as bad as some idiots on here would have you believe, especially as the high revving engine compensates for the lack of torque.
|
justrials2
Member
Registered: 12th Jul 05
User status: Offline
|
honda seam to be more in with the f1 side of motor sport
|
Swiftay
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 05
Location: West Midlands
User status: Offline
|
ClubRally National Championship..


think they may be independelty owned though.
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
yea found a few independants, honda civic vti in the irsh championship but nothing from honda them selfs
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
There was some rallying featuring Hondas on Sky Sports 3 last week. Was in Australia.
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
As its been mentioned , they focus on F1 and GT , like Scoob and Mitsu focus on WRC.
And marcs comment sums everyone up on here, but heck what do i know...
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Indeed, you know nothing!
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
|
mk4_astra
Member
Registered: 15th Oct 03
Location: aylesbury,bucks
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Baskey
do any honda's have 4wd as standard ?
the japanese accord type R, was around 250bhp iirc
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
JDM Accord Type R was FWD, like the UK one.
They did do some 4wd cars, but they were mostly crappy estate cars and stuff.
Whitter, the M3 makes 'crap' torque compared to the VAG V6 because V engines make more torque then straight engines of the same size.
|
whitter45
Member
Registered: 15th Nov 02
Location: Norton
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Robin
JDM Accord Type R was FWD, like the UK one.
They did do some 4wd cars, but they were mostly crappy estate cars and stuff.
Whitter, the M3 makes 'crap' torque compared to the VAG V6 because V engines make more torque then straight engines of the same size.
Your msising my point - I don't think the torque figure is bad it just looks bad compared to the power figure
The Honda engines are fantastic I was trying to show that the Torque figures that the M£ and CTR prodice are not bad compared to other engines of the same size but the extra they deliver is engineering at its best
Hope you see where I'm coming from
|
corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by muppetsport
quote: Originally posted by whitter45
IMO its not the right marketing for the company
Honda have always been involved in motorsport and racing and yes rally is a from of motorsport but their sucess in F1, Indycar, GT etc has meant no need to venture into this category
Its like Subaru - Rally have established them in the car industry and yes prodrive do involve themselves in other motorpsort but Rally is their primary target
Just feel its a Marketing issue - Toyota have had a simialr issues hence F1 and the money it has invested into F1 as a in house devloped car like Renualt and Ferrari as oppose it racing tems such as Maclearn (sp)
yeah, see what your saying actually. i guess from a marketing point of view honda wouldnt benefit anything from the rally world as such unlike as you say subaru who without it would still be selling their cars in tractor and farm related business. i guess most of what we see these days made and developed by honda for their road cars engines and both suspension, they will take more from the f1 and touring car side of things, which to be fair has more of a benefit for the type of road cars they sell, as in the integra type r and the civic type-r. makes a lot of sense of how they developed such a high revving and well handling cars, as the power delivery, although we slate them, most other car makers must be envious of.
Spot on IMO
|
The Fonz
Member
Registered: 9th Dec 05
Location: cumbria
User status: Offline
|
There is a honda crx b16 turbo 4x4 somewhere i've seen but out of the factory, just crv/hrv as mentioned.
Steve as metioned many times, no vtec and vvt not the same. vvt=oil pressure adjusted cam timing, vtec=oil pressure and ecu solinoid controlled timing duration and valve lift, (As in valves open more).
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
what i mean is vvtli is the equivalent of vtec, it was even designed by the guy who designed vtec
note vvtLi not vvti
|