corsasport.co.uk
  Not logged in [Login - Register]  
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In  

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » why is a 19 16v faster than a clio 16v??


New Topic
New Poll 		  <<  1    2    3  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author why is a 19 16v faster than a clio 16v??
Kris TD
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
they have the same engine yet on book figures the 19 is faster, but also a bigger car??
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:16   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Maybe its geared differantly, maybe the book figures r bullshit!
Kris TD
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
just mate has been looking at both. book figures may be bullshit, they must be very close anyway, probs no difference between them
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
power to weight sez the clio.
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:19   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
isnt the 19 16v a 2 litre and clio 1.8 16v?
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Dont think so
Kris TD
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
nah, both are 137 bhp 1.8 16v
Stoneyginger
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 25th Jan 01
Location: Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 12:35   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
I would still say the lighter clio would be faster
--------------------------------------
Yours Stoney CorsaSport Moderator/Organiser : Scotland

stoneyginger@corsasport.co.uk
Click here to sign up for Premium Membership
www.Stoneyginger.co.uk
BeArDy
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 00
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 18:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
and isent the willims slower still
stuyw
Member
Registered: 15th May 02
Location: North West Drives: Rev3 MR2 Turbo
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 19:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
even though the williams has more bhp
SportBoy
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 19:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
french shyt
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
19 16V is slower than a 16V clio. williams is quicker than the 16V clio
stubbsy
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 01
Location: stoke-on-trent
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:28   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
clio is quicker, williams is about a second quicker still than both of em, 2ltr turbo is it in the williams.
stubbsy
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 01
Location: stoke-on-trent
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
just read maxyp, says clio 16v=8.6. 19 16v=7.4 williams=7.6. dont know if thats true
jaffa
Member
Registered: 27th Mar 00
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by stubbsy
just read maxyp, says clio 16v=8.6. 19 16v=7.4 williams=7.6. dont know if thats true



maxy p lie they said i have a 195cc engine
stubbsy
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 01
Location: stoke-on-trent
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
stuyw
Member
Registered: 15th May 02
Location: North West Drives: Rev3 MR2 Turbo
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:57   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
clio williams is not turbo'd
Cole
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: eastbourne Drives:zafira sold now a qashqai
User status: Offline
22nd Mar 03 at 20:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
i had a clio16v and they are quicker than a 19 16v had mine nearly off the clock on the way home form southend one night it was downhill by the way
[spang]
Member
Registered: 25th May 02
Location: Chelmsford, essex
User status: Offline
20th Apr 03 at 22:47   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Ive had a couple of 19's so has my mate, and a couple of clios, i reackon they feel the same but the clio just seems that lttle bit quicker on the pull away, but i reackon the 19 is faster to top end
MrDeCat
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 02
User status: Offline
13th May 03 at 08:17   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
With the exception of the fact that the 19 weighs 100 kg or so more, they are EXACTLY the same... Thus the clio is marginally quicker! The williams is eeven quicker though... P
Pablo
Member
Registered: 3rd Feb 03
Location: Milton Keynes
User status: Offline
13th May 03 at 08:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by stubbsy
clio is quicker, williams is about a second quicker still than both of em, 2ltr turbo is it in the williams.


Just a 2.0 16v
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
13th May 03 at 08:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Dont forget that the R19 is longer and more streamlined than the clio. Same goes for Corsas n Tigras.

Same engines, same gearbox, but tigra is much more areodynamic.

1.4 Corsa - 112mph
1.4 Tigra - 117mph
1.6 Corsa - 119mph (sport)
1.6 Tigra - 124-5mph.
Half Pint
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
User status: Offline
13th May 03 at 09:03   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Daimo Hit the nail on the head the 19 is more aerodynamic therefore helping the car when the air pressure builds up at speed
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
13th May 03 at 09:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Yes.
lee mitchell
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 01
Location: kent...drive's: eveyones conversion cars hard lol
User status: Offline
13th May 03 at 09:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Half Pint
Daimo Hit the nail on the head the 19 is more aerodynamic therefore helping the car when the air pressure builds up at speed
both slow

  <<  1    2    3  >>
New Topic
New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » why is a 19 16v faster than a clio 16v?? 22 database queries in 0.0132871 seconds