corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Titanic 2?


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Titanic 2?
Dan
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 22nd Apr 02
Location: Gorleston on Sea, Norfolk
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 05:53   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Just seen this on sky news. Thoughts?

Seems a strange idea with people losing lives. Should have just been left at that IMO.

http://m.sky.com/skynews/article/worldnews/16218668


Adult GiftsClick here to vist us
sc0ott
Member

Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 07:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Should call it the olympic instead
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 07:45   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

It was really the olympic that sank.
Sam
Moderator
Premium Member


Registered: 24th Dec 99
Location: West Midlands
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 09:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16218668 for the non mobile version of that article...
N3CRO
Member

Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 09:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by John
It was really the olympic that sank.


sc0ott
Member

Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 09:55   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Insurance job.
IvIarkgraham
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 27th Mar 04
Location: Ellesmere Port, Cheshire
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 10:28   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Shit film
Rob E
Member

Registered: 1st Jan 06
Location: Madeley, Stafford....I want to live back in Wales!
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 12:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
quote:
Originally posted by John
It was really the olympic that sank.





Na, it was the Titanic. I watched the most unconvincing documentary I have ever watched stating they swapped the Titanic with the Olympic as an insurance job so I did some research. It would have been impossible to pull off and too noticeable because the ships where not identical (108 externally visible differences to be precise). Also a lot of the stuff from the Olympic was auctioned off when the ship was taken out of service in 1930. A lot of this stuff had the ship builders code '400' (which was the Olympic's build number) imprinted on things, while the Titanic had a build number of '401' which has been found imprinted on items from the wreck site.
sc0ott
Member

Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 12:38   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote



SetH
Member

Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 12:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

MP?

Moosepig
N3CRO
Member

Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 12:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Rob E
quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleOne
quote:
Originally posted by John
It was really the olympic that sank.





Na, it was the Titanic. I watched the most unconvincing documentary I have ever watched stating they swapped the Titanic with the Olympic as an insurance job so I did some research. It would have been impossible to pull off and too noticeable because the ships where not identical (108 externally visible differences to be precise). Also a lot of the stuff from the Olympic was auctioned off when the ship was taken out of service in 1930. A lot of this stuff had the ship builders code '400' (which was the Olympic's build number) imprinted on things, while the Titanic had a build number of '401' which has been found imprinted on items from the wreck site.


This is very true. Too much evidence to prove it was the Titanic that sunk.
sc0ott
Member

Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 13:00   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by SetH
MP?

Moosepig


olyMPic
RichR
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Oct 01
Location: Waterhouses, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 13:01   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by SetH
MP?

Moosepig


OLY 'MP' IC
LeeM
Member

Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 13:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Didn't realise there was a conspiracy about the titanic as well
People into these conspiracys make me laugh, tin foil hats and shit
Nath
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 13:17   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by LeeM
Didn't realise there was a conspiracy about the titanic as well
People into these conspiracys make me laugh, tin foil hats and shit


Same. I genuinely had no idea about this one
RichR
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Oct 01
Location: Waterhouses, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 13:20   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Its actually quite a fascniating story if it could be proved true
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 13:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Conspiracy theories always sound fascinating.
laingyla
Member

Registered: 7th Jan 09
Location: Coedpoeth, Wrexham
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 14:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by sc0ott
Insurance job.


Lmao deffo
LeeM
Member

Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 14:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by John
Conspiracy theories always sound fascinating.


A lot of made up things do
N3CRO
Member

Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 14:52   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by LeeM
Didn't realise there was a conspiracy about the titanic as well
People into these conspiracys make me laugh, tin foil hats and shit


Theres a conspiracy about everything these days.
jamieSxi
Member

Registered: 20th Sep 11
Location: Northern ireland (Lurgan)
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 15:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

There was Titanic, Olympic and Britannic.

Britannic also sank aswell, but could of stayed afloat
Scotty_B
Member

Registered: 11th Jun 03
Location: East Kilbride
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 15:33   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Is Britannic not in the med on it's side still almost intact?
jamieSxi
Member

Registered: 20th Sep 11
Location: Northern ireland (Lurgan)
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 15:37   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yep scotty> think she sank in 1916 as a hospital ship after hittin a mine
sc0ott
Member

Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 15:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I bet it was chris knox who refused to insure the olympic.
Rob E
Member

Registered: 1st Jan 06
Location: Madeley, Stafford....I want to live back in Wales!
User status: Offline
30th Apr 12 at 16:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by sc0ott





This is the PRECISE thing in the documentary I was talking about which made it so unbelievable CGI/Photoshop to the max! I think if this had been the case then it would have been all over the press

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Titanic 2? 23 database queries in 0.0151620 seconds