vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
not very consistant.
14.714 sec 96.4 mph 2.378 sec
15.107 sec 96.8 mph 2.356 sec
15.180 sec 97 mph 2.86 sec
14.553 sec 97.2 mph 2.316 sec
15.100 sec 93.6 mph 2.438 sec
15.211 sec 94.3 mph 2.43 sec
15.407 sec 94.5 mph 2.695 sec
15.251 sec 94.7 mph 2.653 sec
14.980 sec 95.9 mph 2.5 sec
15.144 sec 94.7 mph 2.557 sec
15.034 sec 94.9 mph 2.466 sec
[Edited on 16-10-2003 by vibrio]
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
14.53
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Daimo B
14.53
14.553 you mean
|
The Guru
Member
Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
|
Yup not very consistant.. still testing different stuff out on it!
|
JKGSI
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 02
Location: Mansfield, Notts. Ibiza Cupra-R 180bhp
User status: Offline
|
What gearbox is it running?? LSD??
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Adam Kindness
was speakign to Neil on MSN the other night... his clio cup is running basically identical time to the Bucket V1.... i dont know how consistant he was tho...
i ran 5 or 6 14.4's and about 8 14.5's
all inbetween 96-97mph with 60ft's of 2.3 or so...
Neil's results
14.860 sec 93.8 mph
14.718 sec 95.1 mph
15.037 sec 94.3 mph
14.937sec 93.8 mph
14.888 sec 95.3 mph
14.776 sec 95.5 mph
14.906 sec 93.6 mph
14.603 sec 95.9 mph
14.472sec 95.7 mph
14.755sec 95.7 mph
|
craigpcg
Member
Registered: 17th Mar 01
Location: West Lothian
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
not very consistant.
14.714 sec 96.4 mph 2.378 sec
15.107 sec 96.8 mph 2.356 sec
15.180 sec 97 mph 2.86 sec
14.553 sec 97.2 mph 2.316 sec
15.100 sec 93.6 mph 2.438 sec
15.211 sec 94.3 mph 2.43 sec
15.407 sec 94.5 mph 2.695 sec
15.251 sec 94.7 mph 2.653 sec
14.980 sec 95.9 mph 2.5 sec
15.144 sec 94.7 mph 2.557 sec
15.034 sec 94.9 mph 2.466 sec
utter gashhhhh
but for sum1 that says it could beat a 2.0 16v turbo corsa
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
it could not beat AK's standard engined C20XE. all that extra weight too. not worth it
|
craigpcg
Member
Registered: 17th Mar 01
Location: West Lothian
User status: Offline
|
so there's 1 word for it then?
GASHHHHHHHHHHHHH
|
big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by craigpcg
so there's 1 word for it then?
GASHHHHHHHHHHHHH
|
big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
I take it those times at the top are for the 3ltr v6 corsa that the guy in stirling owns???
|
craigpcg
Member
Registered: 17th Mar 01
Location: West Lothian
User status: Offline
|
yip it sure is
|
J4LDO
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 03
Location: glasgow ish
User status: Offline
|
20xe performance on 1/4s not worth it
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
What time did Kindness get again?
|
craigpcg
Member
Registered: 17th Mar 01
Location: West Lothian
User status: Offline
|
14.4
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
Thats really not that much faster. .200, and the V6 has 17"s!!! And full trim and exterior.
If it wa AK style, then i think AK's car would get beaten.
V6's aint all about bottom end though, there not that kind of engine.
Bet it bloody motors top end!!!!!!
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
0.2s is significantly faster especially when you start getting into the 14's.
[Edited on 17-10-2003 by vibrio]
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
No kidding
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Daimo B
No kidding
then why did you make your statment then
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
Because although adams car has a faster time, the cars are completly different.
If they had the same kinda interior/exterior spec, i think the V6 would get a faster time.
|
big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
I'd like to think so, the engine is a whole 1000cc bigger. Oh and its not got 17's its got 16" speedlines now.
[Edited on 17-10-2003 by big eck]
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
They're all still a mile off my q' mile time
[Edited on 17-10-2003 by Lucky B]
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Lucky B
They're all still a mile off my q' mile time
[Edited on 17-10-2003 by Lucky B]
yes
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Lucky B
They're all still a mile off my q' mile time
[Edited on 17-10-2003 by Lucky B]
Show off
How is that old car of yors anyway? Heard that its fooked now??
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
Na, its had a rebuild but its still going strong.
The new owner is getting 13.7's and by his own admission says it needs a better driver than him to drive it to the best of its potential.
Its getting a 75bhp snort of NOS soon so expect low 13's or maybe even a 12.99 1/4 mile time at some point.
|